Prostate Cancer Score

35579, Oakman, Alabama Prostate Cancer Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 35579, Oakman, Alabama

The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 35579, Oakman, Alabama is 27 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 85.79 percent of the residents in 35579 has some form of health insurance. 46.73 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.36 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35579 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 781 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35579. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 854 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 49 health care providers accessible to residents in 35579, Oakman, Alabama.

Health Scores in 35579, Oakman, Alabama

Prostate Cancer Score 8
People Score 32
Provider Score 27
Hospital Score 30
Travel Score 22

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

35579 Oakman Alabama
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 35579, Oakman, Alabama

**Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Oakman, Alabama (ZIP Code 35579)**

This analysis provides an overview of prostate cancer care within the Oakman, Alabama (ZIP code 35579) area, focusing on physician availability, quality of care indicators, and access to supportive resources. The goal is to assess the overall "Prostate Cancer Score" for this community, offering insights for residents seeking care and highlighting areas for potential improvement. It also considers the primary care landscape as a critical component of early detection and ongoing management.

The foundation of effective prostate cancer management rests on accessible and competent medical professionals. In Oakman, the physician-to-patient ratio, particularly for primary care physicians (PCPs) and urologists, is a crucial factor. Data from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and local healthcare providers should be examined to determine the number of PCPs and urologists actively practicing within the ZIP code and the surrounding areas. This ratio provides a baseline understanding of the potential for timely access to care. A low ratio could indicate potential challenges in scheduling appointments, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment.

The analysis should also consider the distribution of these physicians. Are they concentrated in a single clinic, or are they dispersed throughout the community, making access easier for residents in different areas of Oakman? Proximity to specialists is vital. If urologists are primarily located in nearby cities like Jasper or Birmingham, this impacts travel time and patient convenience, which can affect adherence to follow-up appointments and overall patient satisfaction.

Evaluating the quality of care requires examining several key performance indicators. These include the rates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, the timeliness of diagnostic procedures (such as biopsies and imaging), and the use of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Data from local hospitals, clinics, and physician practices should be reviewed to determine their adherence to established protocols for prostate cancer screening and management. Are patients being screened at the recommended intervals? Are diagnostic procedures performed promptly when indicated? Are treatment plans aligned with national guidelines?

Standout practices within the area should be identified. This involves recognizing clinics or individual physicians who demonstrate exceptional performance in prostate cancer care. This could include practices that consistently achieve high rates of early detection, offer advanced treatment options (such as minimally invasive surgery or radiation therapy), or provide comprehensive patient support services. Identifying these standout practices can help residents make informed decisions about their healthcare choices.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical aspect of the analysis. The use of telemedicine has increased significantly in recent years, particularly in rural areas. Telemedicine can improve access to care by allowing patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially improving convenience. The analysis should assess the availability of telemedicine services for prostate cancer care in Oakman, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient education resources.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but crucial component of cancer care. A prostate cancer diagnosis can significantly impact a patient's emotional well-being. Access to mental health support, such as counseling, support groups, and psychiatric services, is essential for helping patients cope with the psychological challenges of their illness. The analysis should investigate the availability of these resources within the Oakman community, including whether local healthcare providers offer mental health services or refer patients to external providers.

Primary care availability in Oakman is intrinsically linked to prostate cancer outcomes. PCPs play a vital role in early detection through PSA screening and patient education. The analysis must assess the accessibility of primary care services within the community. This includes the number of PCPs practicing in the area, their patient load, and the ease with which patients can schedule appointments. A strong primary care infrastructure is essential for ensuring that men receive timely screening and appropriate referrals to specialists when needed.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the affordability of care. This involves examining the cost of screening tests, diagnostic procedures, and treatment options. Information on insurance coverage, financial assistance programs, and the availability of affordable care options within the community should be gathered. Financial barriers can significantly impact a patient's ability to access and adhere to recommended care.

The analysis should also consider the demographics of the Oakman population. Prostate cancer disproportionately affects older men and African American men. Understanding the demographic makeup of the community can help identify potential disparities in care and inform strategies to address them. For instance, if a significant portion of the population is African American, the analysis should assess whether there are targeted outreach programs to increase screening rates in this high-risk group.

The availability of patient education resources is another critical factor. Patients need access to reliable information about prostate cancer, its risk factors, screening guidelines, treatment options, and side effects. The analysis should assess the availability of patient education materials in Oakman, including brochures, websites, and support groups.

Finally, the analysis should provide a comprehensive "Prostate Cancer Score" for the Oakman community. This score should be based on a weighted assessment of the various factors discussed above, including physician availability, quality of care indicators, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, primary care access, affordability of care, and patient education resources. The score should offer a clear and concise summary of the overall state of prostate cancer care in the area.

To visualize and understand the geographic distribution of physicians, healthcare facilities, and other relevant data points, consider using CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a powerful tool for analyzing the spatial relationships between healthcare resources and the community.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 35579, Oakman, Alabama

You may also like

35580, Parrish, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35579: 7.91 Miles

Total Population:

35546, Berry, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35579: 11.54 Miles

Total Population:

35587, Townley, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35579: 13.96 Miles

Total Population:

35550, Cordova, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35579: 14.54 Miles

Total Population:

35542, Bankston, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35579: 18.02 Miles

Total Population:

35549, Carbon Hill, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35579: 19.19 Miles

Total Population:

35584, Sipsey, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35579: 21.32 Miles

Total Population:

35578, Nauvoo, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35579: 22.86 Miles

Total Population:

35554, Eldridge, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35579: 24.65 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 35579, Oakman, Alabama