Prostate Cancer Score

35613, Athens, Alabama Prostate Cancer Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 35613, Athens, Alabama

The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 35613, Athens, Alabama is 66 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.75 percent of the residents in 35613 has some form of health insurance. 28.62 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 81.94 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35613 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 4,444 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35613. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,703 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,844 health care providers accessible to residents in 35613, Athens, Alabama.

Health Scores in 35613, Athens, Alabama

Prostate Cancer Score 67
People Score 57
Provider Score 66
Hospital Score 26
Travel Score 68

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

35613 Athens Alabama
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 35613, Athens, Alabama

## Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Athens, Alabama (ZIP Code 35613)

This analysis provides an assessment of prostate cancer care and primary care accessibility in Athens, Alabama (ZIP code 35613), focusing on key factors influencing patient outcomes. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement within the local healthcare landscape. The analysis considers physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, all of which contribute to a patient's overall experience and the effectiveness of their care.

The foundation of any robust healthcare system is the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). In Athens, the physician-to-patient ratio for PCPs is a crucial metric. While precise figures fluctuate, understanding the approximate ratio is essential. A lower ratio, indicating more patients per doctor, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial screenings and follow-up care for prostate cancer. Researching and understanding the current PCP-to-patient ratio is vital to assessing the accessibility of primary care within the community. This data is often available through county health departments or state medical boards.

Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs across the ZIP code is important. Are there underserved areas within 35613? Are certain practices overloaded, while others have more capacity? Analyzing the geographic distribution helps identify potential disparities in access to care. This involves examining the locations of practices and comparing them to population density and demographics.

The characteristics of primary care practices also significantly impact patient care. Are practices accepting new patients? What are the average wait times for appointments? Do they offer extended hours or weekend availability? These factors influence a patient's ability to receive timely care, which is particularly critical for prostate cancer, where early detection and intervention are paramount. Practices with advanced scheduling systems and efficient workflows contribute to a more positive patient experience.

The integration of telemedicine is another critical aspect of modern healthcare. Telemedicine offers several benefits, including increased access to specialists, reduced travel time for patients, and improved convenience. In the context of prostate cancer, telemedicine can facilitate consultations with urologists, remote monitoring of patients, and even virtual support groups. Assessing the adoption of telemedicine by local practices, including the availability of virtual appointments and remote monitoring capabilities, provides insight into the community’s preparedness for evolving healthcare needs.

The availability of specialized care, particularly urology services, is crucial for prostate cancer patients. Identifying the number of urologists practicing within or near ZIP code 35613, along with their affiliations and specializations, is a key component of this analysis. Are there any standout practices known for their expertise in prostate cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management? Researching the reputation and patient outcomes of these practices can provide valuable insights for individuals seeking care.

Mental health support is an often-overlooked but essential component of cancer care. A prostate cancer diagnosis can be emotionally challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. The availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is a critical factor in assessing the overall quality of care. Understanding the integration of mental health services within primary care practices and the availability of specialized mental health support for cancer patients is important.

The presence of support groups and patient education programs is also a positive indicator. These resources provide patients with valuable information, emotional support, and a sense of community. Researching the availability of local support groups, educational materials, and patient advocacy organizations is essential for a comprehensive analysis.

Assessing the quality of care also involves examining the use of evidence-based guidelines and best practices. Are local practices adhering to the latest recommendations for prostate cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment? This can be evaluated by reviewing practice protocols, physician certifications, and patient outcomes data, if available.

The cost of care is another significant factor. Understanding the insurance coverage accepted by local practices, the availability of financial assistance programs, and the overall cost of prostate cancer treatment in the area is important. This information helps patients navigate the financial aspects of their care and make informed decisions.

The overall patient experience is a critical metric. Gathering feedback from patients through surveys, online reviews, and other sources can provide valuable insights into the quality of care. This feedback can highlight areas of strength and weakness, helping to identify opportunities for improvement.

The integration of technology in healthcare is constantly evolving. Assessing the use of electronic health records (EHRs), patient portals, and other digital tools can provide insights into the efficiency and effectiveness of care delivery. EHRs facilitate communication between providers, improve data management, and enhance patient engagement.

The analysis should also consider the community's health literacy. Are there resources available to help patients understand their diagnosis, treatment options, and the importance of follow-up care? Health literacy initiatives can empower patients to take an active role in their care.

The availability of palliative care services is also important. Palliative care focuses on providing comfort and support to patients with serious illnesses, including prostate cancer. Assessing the availability of palliative care specialists, hospice services, and other supportive care resources is an important aspect of this analysis.

Finally, the analysis should consider the overall healthcare infrastructure in Athens. This includes the presence of hospitals, imaging centers, and other healthcare facilities. The proximity of these facilities and their ability to provide comprehensive care are critical factors in assessing the quality of care.

In conclusion, a comprehensive prostate cancer score analysis for Athens, Alabama (ZIP code 35613) requires a multi-faceted approach. It involves evaluating physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the overall patient experience. By considering these factors, we can gain a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape and identify opportunities for improvement.

For a visual representation of this data, including physician locations, healthcare facility locations, and demographic information, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. Use these maps to visualize the distribution of resources and identify potential gaps in care within the community.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 35613, Athens, Alabama

You may also like

35611, Athens, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35613: 5.62 Miles

Total Population:

35615, Belle Mina, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35613: 9.27 Miles

Total Population:

35620, Elkmont, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35613: 10.04 Miles

Total Population:

35614, Athens, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35613: 10.35 Miles

Total Population:

35649, Mooresville, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35613: 11.43 Miles

Total Population:

35601, Decatur, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35613: 14.38 Miles

Total Population:

35647, Lester, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35613: 15.76 Miles

Total Population:

35603, Decatur, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35613: 17.21 Miles

Total Population:

35643, Hillsboro, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 35613: 19.22 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 35613, Athens, Alabama