The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 35772, Stevenson, Alabama is 36 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 88.99 percent of the residents in 35772 has some form of health insurance. 43.47 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.82 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35772 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,138 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35772. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 834 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 516 health care providers accessible to residents in 35772, Stevenson, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35772, Stevenson, Alabama
| Prostate Cancer Score | 5 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 19 |
| Provider Score | 36 |
| Hospital Score | 24 |
| Travel Score | 20 |
| 35772 | Stevenson | Alabama | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 35772, encompassing Stevenson, Alabama, requires a nuanced approach, particularly when assessing prostate cancer care and primary care accessibility. This analysis delves into the availability of physicians, the quality of care, and the resources available to patients, ultimately aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare environment. The focus will be on the specific needs of men seeking prostate cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment, while also considering the broader context of primary care access in the area.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. In rural areas like Stevenson, the availability of primary care physicians and specialists can be significantly lower than in urban centers. A low physician-to-patient ratio can lead to longer wait times for appointments, limited access to specialized care, and potentially delayed diagnoses. Assessing this ratio requires examining the number of primary care physicians, urologists, and oncologists practicing within the ZIP code or the surrounding areas that serve Stevenson residents. Data from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and state medical boards would be essential in calculating this ratio accurately.
Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of physicians matters. Are primary care practices evenly distributed throughout the community, or are they concentrated in specific locations, potentially creating access challenges for residents in certain areas? Are there any urologists or oncologists who have a practice within the ZIP code? If not, how far do patients need to travel to access specialized prostate cancer care? These geographical considerations are crucial in evaluating the accessibility of healthcare services.
Identifying standout practices involves evaluating factors beyond just the number of physicians. Patient reviews, practice accreditations, and the adoption of advanced technologies can all contribute to the quality of care. Practices with a strong reputation for patient satisfaction, as evidenced by online reviews and testimonials, often indicate a commitment to providing high-quality care. Accreditation by organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) can also be a marker of quality, as it signifies that a practice meets specific standards for patient care and operational efficiency.
The adoption of advanced technologies, particularly in the context of prostate cancer care, is another key indicator. Practices that utilize advanced imaging techniques, such as MRI and PET scans, can improve the accuracy of diagnoses and treatment planning. The availability of minimally invasive surgical options, such as robotic-assisted prostatectomy, can also enhance patient outcomes and recovery times.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas where access to in-person care can be challenging. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and improving access to care for those with mobility limitations or transportation barriers. Evaluating the extent of telemedicine adoption among primary care practices and urologists in the area is crucial. This includes assessing the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring capabilities, and the use of telehealth platforms.
Mental health resources are often overlooked, but they are essential for patients dealing with a cancer diagnosis. The emotional toll of a prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment can be significant, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Evaluating the availability of mental health services, such as counseling and support groups, is crucial. Are there mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, available in the area? Are there any support groups specifically for men with prostate cancer and their families?
The integration of mental health services within the healthcare system is also important. Do primary care practices and urology clinics have referral pathways to mental health providers? Do they screen patients for mental health concerns? A holistic approach to patient care that addresses both physical and mental health needs is essential for improving patient outcomes.
Assessing the availability of resources for prostate cancer screening and early detection is also critical. Are there initiatives in place to promote prostate cancer screening among men in the community? Do primary care practices offer prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing? Are there educational materials available to help men understand the importance of screening and early detection?
The availability of support services for patients undergoing treatment is another important consideration. Are there resources available to help patients manage the side effects of treatment, such as urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction? Are there physical therapy services available to help patients recover from surgery or radiation therapy? The availability of these support services can significantly impact the quality of life for patients.
Finally, the cost of healthcare is a significant factor for patients. The cost of prostate cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment can be substantial. Assessing the availability of financial assistance programs and insurance coverage options is important. Are there resources available to help patients navigate the complexities of the healthcare system and access affordable care?
In conclusion, evaluating the healthcare landscape in ZIP code 35772, with a specific focus on prostate cancer care and primary care accessibility, requires a multi-faceted approach. Analyzing physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, assessing telemedicine adoption, and evaluating the availability of mental health resources are all crucial components of this assessment. A comprehensive understanding of these factors is essential for ensuring that residents of Stevenson have access to high-quality, affordable healthcare.
To visualize and better understand the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, hospital proximity, and patient demographics, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide valuable insights into the healthcare landscape, empowering you to make informed decisions about your healthcare needs.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like