Health Scores Near 20064, Washington, District of Columbia
You may also like
The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 20064, Washington, District of Columbia is 75 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.99 percent of the residents in 20064 has some form of health insurance. 8.06 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 93.01 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20064 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 494 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 18 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20064. An estimate of 21 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 11 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 12,289 health care providers accessible to residents in 20064, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20064, Washington, District of Columbia
| Prostate Cancer Score | 53 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 15 |
| Provider Score | 75 |
| Hospital Score | 41 |
| Travel Score | 65 |
| 20064 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Prostate cancer is a significant health concern, particularly for men. Early detection and effective treatment are crucial for positive outcomes. This analysis examines the landscape of prostate cancer care within ZIP Code 20064 and the broader context of primary care availability in Washington, aiming to provide insights into the quality and accessibility of care. We will explore factors influencing prostate cancer care, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, ultimately providing a comprehensive overview.
The analysis begins by acknowledging the importance of primary care physicians (PCPs) in the early detection and management of prostate cancer. PCPs often serve as the first point of contact for patients, performing initial screenings, ordering diagnostic tests, and providing referrals to specialists. The availability of PCPs in a given area directly impacts the accessibility of these critical services.
ZIP Code 20064, encompassing a specific geographic area, likely presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities. Analyzing the physician-to-patient ratio in this area provides a baseline understanding of the potential for access to care. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per patient, could lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially reduced access to preventive care. Conversely, a lower ratio might suggest a more favorable environment for patients seeking care.
Within ZIP Code 20064, identifying standout practices is essential. These practices may demonstrate excellence in prostate cancer care through various metrics. This could include early detection rates, adherence to established treatment guidelines, patient satisfaction scores, and the integration of innovative technologies. The presence of specialized prostate cancer clinics or centers of excellence within the area would be a significant advantage, offering patients access to advanced diagnostic and treatment options.
Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool in healthcare, particularly in expanding access to care and improving patient convenience. The adoption of telemedicine by practices within ZIP Code 20064 is a crucial factor. Telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring, potentially reducing the burden on patients and improving their overall experience. The availability of telemedicine options can be particularly beneficial for patients with mobility limitations or those living in geographically isolated areas.
The importance of mental health resources in prostate cancer care cannot be overstated. A prostate cancer diagnosis can be emotionally challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. The availability of mental health support services, such as counseling and support groups, is vital for patients navigating the emotional and psychological aspects of their illness. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care models are better equipped to provide holistic support to their patients.
Expanding our scope to the broader context of primary care availability in Washington, we can assess the overall healthcare landscape. The state-wide physician-to-patient ratio, availability of specialists, and the presence of comprehensive cancer centers all contribute to the quality of care available to patients. Analyzing these factors provides a broader perspective on the challenges and opportunities facing prostate cancer care in the region.
The analysis of primary care availability in Washington should also consider geographic disparities. Access to care may vary significantly depending on the location within the state. Rural areas, for example, may face greater challenges in accessing primary care physicians and specialists compared to urban centers. Addressing these disparities requires targeted interventions and policies aimed at improving access to care in underserved communities.
The adoption of innovative technologies in prostate cancer care is another critical factor. This includes advanced imaging techniques, such as MRI and PET scans, which can improve the accuracy of diagnosis and staging. The use of minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted surgery, can lead to reduced recovery times and improved patient outcomes. Practices that embrace technological advancements are often better positioned to provide cutting-edge care.
Patient education and empowerment play a crucial role in prostate cancer care. Providing patients with clear and concise information about their diagnosis, treatment options, and potential side effects is essential. Empowering patients to actively participate in their care decisions can lead to improved outcomes and greater satisfaction. Practices that prioritize patient education and shared decision-making are more likely to foster a positive patient experience.
The analysis should also consider the role of insurance coverage and affordability in accessing prostate cancer care. The cost of diagnostic tests, treatment, and follow-up care can be a significant barrier for many patients. Examining the availability of insurance options, financial assistance programs, and the overall affordability of care is essential for ensuring equitable access to services.
Furthermore, the analysis should evaluate the presence of community-based resources and support networks. Support groups, patient advocacy organizations, and community health programs can provide valuable assistance to patients and their families. These resources can offer emotional support, practical advice, and access to information about available services.
In conclusion, evaluating prostate cancer care within ZIP Code 20064 and the broader context of primary care availability in Washington requires a multifaceted approach. By examining physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and other relevant factors, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the landscape of care. This analysis highlights the importance of early detection, access to specialized care, the integration of technology, and the provision of holistic support to patients.
If you'd like to visualize the data and gain a more granular understanding of the healthcare landscape, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. They provide interactive visualizations, allowing you to analyze geographic patterns and identify areas with the greatest needs.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like
