20204, Washington, District of Columbia Prostate Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 20204, Washington, District of Columbia is 75 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20204 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20204 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20204. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 16,784 health care providers accessible to residents in 20204, Washington, District of Columbia.

## Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Washington, D.C. (ZIP Code 20204) and Primary Care Landscape

This analysis delves into the availability and quality of prostate cancer care within Washington, D.C., specifically focusing on ZIP code 20204, and examines the broader primary care landscape of the city. We will evaluate key factors influencing prostate cancer outcomes, including physician access, practice quality, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support, ultimately aiming to provide a comprehensive ‘Prostate Cancer Score’ assessment.

ZIP code 20204, primarily encompassing federal government buildings and offices, presents a unique challenge in assessing healthcare access. While residential populations within the area are limited, the proximity to major hospitals and medical centers in surrounding areas, such as the National Mall and Capitol Hill, significantly impacts the healthcare options available to those who work or live within this ZIP code. The primary care landscape is crucial, as early detection and referral are paramount in successful prostate cancer management.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a fundamental indicator of healthcare accessibility. Washington, D.C., generally faces challenges in primary care physician availability, with ratios often exceeding the national average. This scarcity can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial screenings and consultations for prostate cancer. Within the broader D.C. area, however, the concentration of specialists, including urologists and oncologists, is relatively high, partially offsetting the primary care limitations. Analyzing the specific physician-to-patient ratios within the immediate vicinity of 20204, and the ease of access to specialists, is critical to a thorough score.

Standout practices contribute significantly to the quality of care. Identifying practices with a demonstrated commitment to prostate cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment is essential. This includes evaluating the use of advanced diagnostic tools, such as MRI and genomic testing, and assessing the experience of the urologists and oncologists within these practices. Furthermore, the adoption of multidisciplinary approaches, involving collaboration between urologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists, is a key indicator of high-quality care. Examining patient outcomes, such as survival rates and patient satisfaction scores, provides further insights into the effectiveness of these practices.

Telemedicine adoption has emerged as a vital component of modern healthcare, particularly in areas with access challenges. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and even remote monitoring can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those residing in areas with limited physician availability. Assessing the extent to which practices in and around 20204 have embraced telemedicine, and the types of services offered virtually, is a crucial factor in the ‘Prostate Cancer Score’. This also includes evaluating the ease of use of these platforms and the availability of technical support for patients.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of cancer care, yet they are critically important. A prostate cancer diagnosis can have a profound impact on a patient’s emotional and psychological well-being. Access to mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, who specialize in oncology, is essential for supporting patients through the challenges of diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship. Evaluating the availability of these resources, including on-site counseling services and referrals to mental health providers, is a key component of the overall score. This includes assessing the integration of mental health services into the overall care plan and the availability of support groups and educational programs.

The primary care landscape in Washington, D.C., is characterized by a mix of large hospital systems, community health centers, and private practices. While the concentration of specialists is high, the availability of primary care physicians remains a challenge. This necessitates a focus on efficient referral pathways and strong communication between primary care providers and specialists. Furthermore, the socio-economic diversity of the city influences healthcare access, with disparities in insurance coverage and access to care potentially impacting prostate cancer outcomes. Therefore, a comprehensive ‘Prostate Cancer Score’ must consider the equitable distribution of resources and the availability of support services for underserved populations.

Specifically, for ZIP code 20204, the score should consider the proximity to major medical centers, the ease of access to specialists from this location, and the availability of transportation options for patients. The score should also factor in the availability of federal employee health benefits and the extent to which these benefits cover prostate cancer screening and treatment. Furthermore, the score should evaluate the availability of educational resources and support groups for federal employees and their families.

In conclusion, the ‘Prostate Cancer Score’ for doctors in ZIP code 20204 and the broader primary care landscape in Washington, D.C., is a complex assessment. It requires a nuanced evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the broader socio-economic context. By analyzing these factors, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system and identify areas for improvement. This information can be used to empower patients, inform healthcare providers, and advocate for policies that promote better prostate cancer outcomes.

To visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, physician availability, and patient demographics, explore interactive maps and data visualizations with CartoChrome maps. Uncover actionable insights and make informed decisions about your healthcare journey.