Health Scores Near 20260, Washington, District of Columbia
You may also like
The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 20260, Washington, District of Columbia is 75 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20260 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20260 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20260. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 586 health care providers accessible to residents in 20260, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20260, Washington, District of Columbia
| Prostate Cancer Score | 48 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 1 |
| Provider Score | 75 |
| Hospital Score | 53 |
| Travel Score | 61 |
| 20260 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis presented below evaluates prostate cancer care within the constraints of "doctors in ZIP Code 20260" and "primary care availability in Washington," focusing on the factors that contribute to a high-quality, patient-centered experience. This includes an assessment of physician-to-patient ratios, the identification of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all within the context of prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. This is not an exhaustive medical review, but rather a snapshot of the healthcare landscape.
ZIP Code 20260, a federal government-centric area, presents a unique healthcare ecosystem. While the specific number of practicing urologists within this ZIP code is not readily available through public databases, the proximity to major medical centers in the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia suggests access to specialized care. Primary care physicians (PCPs) serve as the initial point of contact, crucial for early detection and referral. The effectiveness of this system hinges on the physician-to-patient ratio, the capacity of PCPs to recognize early signs of prostate cancer, and their ability to navigate the referral process efficiently.
The physician-to-patient ratio in the broader Washington, D.C. metropolitan area is a critical indicator. A higher ratio of specialists to patients generally translates to better access to care. However, this is not the only factor. The quality of care, the efficiency of appointments, and the integration of care across different specialties are equally important. The ability of a patient to see a urologist promptly after a concerning PSA test or a positive digital rectal exam is paramount. Delays in diagnosis can significantly impact treatment outcomes.
Standout practices are those that demonstrate excellence in several areas. This includes a commitment to patient education, the use of advanced diagnostic tools, and a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. These practices often have dedicated nurse navigators who guide patients through the complex process of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care. They may also participate in clinical trials, offering patients access to the latest advancements in prostate cancer treatment. Identifying these practices requires a deeper dive into individual physician profiles, patient reviews, and practice accreditations.
Telemedicine has become increasingly important in healthcare, particularly for follow-up appointments and consultations. Its adoption in prostate cancer care can improve access to specialists, reduce travel time for patients, and provide convenient access to information and support. The availability of telemedicine platforms, the training of physicians in their use, and the reimbursement policies of insurance providers all impact the effectiveness of telemedicine in this context. Practices that have embraced telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and accessibility.
The mental health of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer is often overlooked, yet it is a crucial component of their overall well-being. The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer can be emotionally challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. The availability of mental health resources, such as counseling services, support groups, and access to psychiatrists, is therefore essential. Practices that integrate mental health support into their care model demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care.
Primary care availability in Washington is a broad term, but it is essential to prostate cancer care. PCPs are the gatekeepers to specialist care. Their ability to identify risk factors, order appropriate screening tests, and make timely referrals is crucial. The quality of primary care, the availability of appointments, and the communication between PCPs and specialists all impact the patient experience. A strong primary care system is a cornerstone of effective prostate cancer care.
Specific data on the performance of individual practices within ZIP Code 20260 is challenging to obtain. However, the proximity to major medical centers suggests that patients in this area have access to a range of specialists and treatment options. The focus should be on identifying practices that excel in patient-centered care, embrace technology, and integrate mental health support. This involves a combination of research, patient reviews, and consultation with healthcare professionals.
The evaluation of prostate cancer care in this area necessitates a multi-faceted approach. This includes an assessment of physician-to-patient ratios, the identification of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to ensure that patients have access to high-quality, patient-centered care that addresses their physical, emotional, and psychological needs. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving.
The complexity of prostate cancer care necessitates a nuanced understanding of the healthcare ecosystem. The availability of specialists, the efficiency of the referral process, and the integration of mental health support all play critical roles. Practices that prioritize patient education, embrace technology, and offer comprehensive care are best positioned to provide optimal outcomes. The focus should be on ensuring that patients have access to the resources and support they need to navigate this challenging journey.
The current analysis is a starting point. Further research, including patient interviews and a deeper dive into individual practice profiles, is needed to provide a more comprehensive assessment. The goal is to empower patients with the information they need to make informed decisions about their care. The availability of resources, the quality of care, and the patient experience are all interconnected.
To visualize the healthcare landscape and gain a deeper understanding of the location of healthcare providers, their specialties, and other relevant data, consider exploring the power of location intelligence with CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like
