The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia is 75 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20319 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20319 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20319. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 182 health care providers accessible to residents in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia
| Prostate Cancer Score | 39 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 1 |
| Provider Score | 75 |
| Hospital Score | 47 |
| Travel Score | 54 |
| 20319 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
This analysis delves into the landscape of prostate cancer care within ZIP code 20319, a location likely encompassing a specific area within Washington, D.C., and examines primary care accessibility throughout the broader Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. The goal is to assess the quality of care, focusing on factors relevant to prostate cancer diagnosis, treatment, and patient support. This analysis will incorporate physician-to-patient ratios, practice highlights, telemedicine integration, and mental health resource availability. The ultimate aim is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment, particularly as it relates to prostate cancer patients.
The initial assessment requires a foundational understanding of the physician-to-patient ratio within the target area. Precise data on the number of urologists, oncologists, and primary care physicians (PCPs) practicing within ZIP code 20319 is critical. This data, ideally sourced from the American Medical Association (AMA) or similar professional organizations, provides a baseline understanding of access. A low physician-to-patient ratio, particularly for specialists, could indicate potential challenges in timely diagnosis and treatment. The broader Washington, D.C. area’s physician-to-patient ratio for primary care is also relevant, as PCPs often play a crucial role in initial screenings and referrals. This area's ratio can vary significantly depending on the neighborhood, and this variability needs to be considered.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care is influenced by the presence of standout practices. Identifying practices with a strong reputation for prostate cancer treatment requires research. This involves examining online patient reviews, assessing accreditations from organizations like the American College of Surgeons (ACS), and analyzing the experience and specialization of the physicians within these practices. The presence of robotic surgery capabilities, a common treatment modality for prostate cancer, is a significant factor. Practices with a multidisciplinary approach, involving urologists, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, and supportive care specialists, are generally considered to offer more comprehensive care.
Telemedicine has emerged as a vital component of modern healthcare, particularly for follow-up appointments, medication management, and patient education. Assessing the adoption of telemedicine within the practices serving ZIP code 20319 is essential. Practices offering virtual consultations can enhance access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in areas with limited in-person options. The availability of remote monitoring technologies, allowing for the tracking of patient symptoms and treatment responses, is another indicator of advanced care. The quality of the telemedicine platform, including ease of use, data security, and integration with electronic health records, is also a factor.
Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment can significantly impact a patient's mental health. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial aspect of care. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. Assessing the integration of mental health services within the healthcare practices serving ZIP code 20319 is important. Do practices offer on-site counseling or have established referral networks for mental health support? The availability of support groups specifically for prostate cancer patients and their families is another positive indicator. Furthermore, the awareness and training of healthcare providers in addressing the psychological impact of cancer are vital.
Primary care accessibility throughout Washington, D.C. is a crucial consideration. While ZIP code 20319 may have specific strengths or weaknesses, the overall availability of primary care impacts the entire healthcare ecosystem. Factors to consider include the number of PCPs per capita, the average wait times for appointments, and the acceptance of various insurance plans. The presence of community health centers, which often serve underserved populations, is also a positive indicator. The location of primary care practices relative to ZIP code 20319 residents influences access, and transportation options also need to be considered.
The overall 'Prostate Cancer Score' for doctors in ZIP code 20319 and primary care availability in Washington, D.C. should be a composite score. It should weigh the factors discussed above: physician-to-patient ratios, practice reputations, telemedicine integration, and mental health resource availability. The weighting of each factor depends on its relative importance. For example, a practice with an excellent reputation and advanced treatment options may offset a slightly unfavorable physician-to-patient ratio. The score should reflect the overall quality and accessibility of prostate cancer care.
The final assessment should provide a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape. It should highlight areas where access to care is good and areas where improvements are needed. The analysis should be specific, providing actionable insights for patients seeking prostate cancer care. This could include recommendations for specific practices, information on telemedicine options, and details on available mental health resources. The goal is to empower patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare.
In conclusion, understanding the complexities of prostate cancer care requires a comprehensive analysis of various factors. The assessment of physician-to-patient ratios, practice reputations, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource availability provides a valuable framework for evaluating the quality and accessibility of care within ZIP code 20319 and the broader Washington, D.C. area. This analysis is designed to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment, particularly as it relates to prostate cancer patients.
For a deeper dive into the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, patient demographics, and access to care indicators, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. These maps provide a visually rich and interactive way to understand the healthcare landscape and identify potential areas for improvement.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
