Health Scores Near 30104, Aragon, Georgia
You may also like
The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 30104, Aragon, Georgia is 44 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 85.81 percent of the residents in 30104 has some form of health insurance. 28.26 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 67.93 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30104 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,263 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30104. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 662 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 15,266 health care providers accessible to residents in 30104, Aragon, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30104, Aragon, Georgia
| Prostate Cancer Score | 45 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 51 |
| Provider Score | 44 |
| Hospital Score | 50 |
| Travel Score | 41 |
| 30104 | Aragon | Georgia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below provides a hypothetical "Prostate Cancer Score" assessment for primary care physicians in ZIP code 30104 (Aragon, Georgia) and the availability of primary care services within the same area. This score considers factors relevant to prostate cancer detection and management, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and access to mental health resources. The information presented is for illustrative purposes only and does not reflect real-world data.
The “Prostate Cancer Score” is a composite metric, not a singular number, that evaluates the quality and accessibility of prostate cancer-related healthcare. It considers several key areas. The first area is the **Physician-to-Patient Ratio**. A lower ratio, meaning fewer patients per physician, generally indicates better access to care and potentially more time for each patient during appointments, allowing for more thorough examinations and discussions about prostate cancer risk factors and screening. In Aragon, the availability of primary care physicians is a significant factor. A higher ratio could suggest potential delays in appointments and less personalized care, which could impact early detection and management.
The second component is **Practice Characteristics**. This includes factors such as the type of practice (solo, group, or hospital-affiliated), the presence of on-site diagnostic capabilities (like PSA testing), and the availability of urology referrals. Practices with integrated services and strong referral networks generally receive a higher score. The presence of on-site diagnostic tools streamlines the process, enabling quicker results and potentially earlier intervention if needed. Furthermore, the strength of a practice's referral network to urologists is vital for prompt diagnosis and treatment.
The third component focuses on **Telemedicine Adoption**. Telemedicine, the use of technology for remote healthcare, can play a crucial role in prostate cancer care. It allows for virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and educational sessions, especially beneficial for patients in rural areas or those with mobility issues. Practices that actively utilize telemedicine receive a higher score, reflecting their commitment to patient convenience and access.
The fourth component evaluates **Mental Health Resources**. Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being. Access to mental health support, such as counseling or support groups, is critical. Practices that offer or refer patients to mental health services receive a higher score. This is due to the recognition of the profound emotional and psychological effects of a cancer diagnosis and treatment.
For the purpose of this analysis, we will assume the hypothetical "Prostate Cancer Score" is graded on a scale, with the highest score indicating the best level of care.
In Aragon (ZIP code 30104), the primary care landscape is examined. We assume a limited number of primary care physicians practice in the area, potentially leading to a relatively high physician-to-patient ratio. This could translate to longer wait times for appointments and less individualized care. The score for this component would be adjusted accordingly.
Regarding practice characteristics, we assume that the primary care practices in Aragon may vary. Some might be solo practices, while others could be part of a larger group or affiliated with a hospital system. The presence of on-site diagnostic tools and strong referral networks is crucial. Practices with these features would score higher. For example, a practice that offers on-site PSA testing and has a well-established relationship with a local urologist would be considered more favorable.
Telemedicine adoption is assessed. If primary care practices in Aragon have embraced telemedicine for consultations, follow-up appointments, or educational sessions, their score would be positively impacted. Practices that have not adopted telemedicine, or have limited use, would receive a lower score.
The availability of mental health resources is also evaluated. If practices offer in-house counseling or have strong referral pathways to mental health professionals, their score would be higher. The ability to address the emotional and psychological needs of patients is an essential aspect of comprehensive prostate cancer care.
Standout practices, if they exist, would be those that excel in multiple areas. For example, a practice with a low physician-to-patient ratio, on-site PSA testing, robust telemedicine capabilities, and strong mental health support would receive a significantly higher overall score. This practice would be considered a model for providing comprehensive prostate cancer-related care.
It is also important to consider the potential challenges faced by patients in Aragon. Rural areas often face challenges related to transportation, limited access to specialists, and a lack of resources. These challenges can impact early detection, timely diagnosis, and effective treatment. Therefore, any practice that actively addresses these challenges, such as offering transportation assistance or providing educational materials, would be viewed favorably.
The “Prostate Cancer Score” analysis is not a definitive ranking. It is a conceptual framework for evaluating the quality and accessibility of prostate cancer-related healthcare. The specific scores assigned to each practice would depend on the availability of real-world data and the specific criteria used for evaluation.
In conclusion, the "Prostate Cancer Score" for primary care in Aragon (ZIP code 30104) depends on several factors. The physician-to-patient ratio, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource availability all contribute to the overall score. Practices that offer comprehensive care, including early detection, timely diagnosis, and mental health support, will receive higher scores. The goal is to identify and promote best practices to improve prostate cancer outcomes for patients in the community.
To visualize the primary care landscape in Aragon, including the locations of physicians, practice characteristics, and access to resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the data, making it easier to understand the distribution of resources and identify areas where improvements are needed.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like
