39144, Pattison, Mississippi Prostate Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 39144, Pattison, Mississippi is 12 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 78.72 percent of the residents in 39144 has some form of health insurance. 69.79 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 16.88 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39144 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 264 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39144. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 219 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 44 health care providers accessible to residents in 39144, Pattison, Mississippi.

## Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in 39144 & Primary Care in Pattison

This analysis provides a nuanced assessment of healthcare resources relevant to prostate cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment within ZIP code 39144 (Pattison, Mississippi) and the broader context of primary care availability in the area. The focus is on evaluating the accessibility and quality of care, considering factors beyond simple physician counts, including telemedicine adoption, mental health support, and the overall patient experience. A "Prostate Cancer Score" is a composite metric, not a single number, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape.

The initial step involves assessing the physician landscape within 39144. While the ZIP code itself is primarily rural, the analysis must consider the surrounding areas where residents likely seek care. This necessitates examining the physician-to-patient ratio, a crucial indicator of access. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, presents a significant challenge. Researching the availability of urologists, oncologists, and primary care physicians (PCPs) specializing in men’s health is paramount. The presence of these specialists within a reasonable driving distance is vital for timely diagnosis and treatment.

Furthermore, the quality of care depends on the expertise and experience of the medical professionals. Identifying standout practices, those with a proven track record in prostate cancer care, is essential. This includes examining patient reviews, physician certifications, and the use of advanced diagnostic and treatment technologies. Are there practices utilizing the latest imaging techniques, such as multiparametric MRI, for accurate diagnosis? Do they offer minimally invasive surgical options like robotic-assisted prostatectomy? The availability of these advanced modalities significantly impacts patient outcomes.

Telemedicine adoption plays a crucial role, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, enabling patients to consult with specialists remotely. Assessing the extent of telemedicine integration within local practices is a key component of the analysis. Are physicians offering virtual consultations for follow-up appointments, medication management, and even initial screenings? Telemedicine can improve access to care and reduce the burden of travel for patients.

Beyond the purely medical aspects, the analysis must incorporate mental health considerations. A prostate cancer diagnosis can be emotionally taxing, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Evaluating the availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is critical. Does the local healthcare system provide integrated mental health services, or do patients have to seek these services separately? The integration of mental health support within the cancer care pathway is a sign of a comprehensive and patient-centered approach.

Primary care availability in Pattison is also evaluated. PCPs often serve as the first point of contact for patients, providing screening and initial assessments. The accessibility of PCPs, including their willingness to screen for prostate cancer and refer patients to specialists when necessary, is crucial. This involves examining the number of PCPs in the area, their patient load, and their commitment to preventive care. A strong primary care foundation is essential for early detection and improved outcomes.

The analysis must also consider the insurance landscape. Does the local healthcare system accept a wide range of insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid? Insurance coverage significantly impacts access to care, and limited coverage can create barriers to screening, diagnosis, and treatment. The analysis must examine the affordability of care, including the cost of consultations, diagnostic tests, and medications.

The patient experience is a vital factor. This involves assessing patient satisfaction with the care they receive, the communication skills of the physicians, and the overall accessibility of the healthcare system. Patient reviews, surveys, and feedback mechanisms provide valuable insights into the quality of care and the patient experience. A positive patient experience is a sign of a well-functioning healthcare system.

The analysis requires a thorough investigation of the local healthcare infrastructure. This includes identifying hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare facilities in the area. Are these facilities equipped with the necessary technology and resources to provide comprehensive prostate cancer care? The availability of specialized equipment, such as radiation therapy machines, is a key consideration.

The analysis also considers the availability of support services for patients and their families. This includes cancer support groups, patient education programs, and financial assistance resources. These services can provide valuable support during a challenging time. The presence of these support services indicates a commitment to patient-centered care.

The "Prostate Cancer Score" for 39144 is not a simple numerical rating. It is a multifaceted assessment that considers various factors. The score is a reflection of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape. The score is a tool for understanding the quality of care. The score is a guide for improvement. The score is a call to action.

In conclusion, this analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the healthcare resources relevant to prostate cancer care in 39144 and the surrounding areas. The assessment emphasizes the importance of physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the overall patient experience.

For a visual representation of this data and a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in 39144 and beyond, explore the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome. CartoChrome provides powerful tools for analyzing geographic data and gaining valuable insights into healthcare access and quality. Visit CartoChrome today to visualize the data and gain a clearer picture of the healthcare resources available in your area.