Health Scores Near 39425, Brooklyn, Mississippi
You may also like
The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 39425, Brooklyn, Mississippi is 65 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 76.90 percent of the residents in 39425 has some form of health insurance. 34.12 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 50.52 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39425 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 790 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 12 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39425. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 431 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,314 health care providers accessible to residents in 39425, Brooklyn, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39425, Brooklyn, Mississippi
| Prostate Cancer Score | 57 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 76 |
| Provider Score | 65 |
| Hospital Score | 29 |
| Travel Score | 32 |
| 39425 | Brooklyn | Mississippi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The following analysis assesses prostate cancer care quality and primary care accessibility, ranking physicians in ZIP Code 39425 (Hattiesburg, Mississippi) and primary care resources in Brooklyn, New York. This evaluation considers factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, practice excellence, telemedicine integration, and availability of mental health support.
**Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Hattiesburg, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39425)**
The prostate cancer landscape in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, presents a unique challenge. The population density, coupled with the prevalence of prostate cancer, demands a robust and accessible healthcare infrastructure. Evaluating the quality of care necessitates an understanding of several key metrics.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator. In 39425, the availability of urologists, specifically those specializing in prostate cancer treatment, is a primary concern. A low physician-to-patient ratio can lead to delayed diagnoses, longer wait times for appointments, and potentially compromised treatment outcomes. Data collection from state medical boards, insurance providers, and patient surveys is essential to determine this ratio accurately. The analysis should account for the number of practicing urologists, their specialization, and the overall population served within the ZIP code.
Identifying standout practices is crucial. This involves evaluating the facilities' use of advanced diagnostic tools like MRI and PET scans, the adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques, and the availability of radiation therapy options. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to continuous improvement, evidenced by participation in clinical trials and adherence to established treatment guidelines, should be highly regarded. Patient satisfaction scores, derived from surveys and online reviews, also contribute to the assessment.
Telemedicine adoption is another vital factor. Telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of patients, and online access to medical records are demonstrating a forward-thinking approach. The availability of telemedicine can reduce the burden on patients and enhance the efficiency of healthcare delivery.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are an essential part of prostate cancer care. The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer can be emotionally taxing, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house counselors or referrals to external providers, demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care. The availability of support groups, educational materials, and access to mental health professionals should be assessed.
**Primary Care Availability Analysis: Brooklyn, New York**
Brooklyn, with its diverse population and high population density, presents a different set of challenges regarding primary care accessibility. The focus shifts from a rural environment to a densely populated urban setting.
Physician-to-patient ratios in Brooklyn are subject to significant variations across different neighborhoods. The analysis must consider the concentration of primary care physicians in each area, factoring in the number of family practitioners, internal medicine specialists, and geriatricians. Data from the New York State Department of Health and local healthcare organizations is essential to accurately determine these ratios.
Standout practices in Brooklyn will be those that prioritize patient-centered care. This includes offering extended hours, same-day appointments, and multilingual staff to cater to the diverse population. Practices that are recognized for their commitment to preventative care, such as regular screenings and health education programs, should be highlighted. The use of electronic health records and patient portals to facilitate communication and access to medical information is also a key consideration.
Telemedicine plays a vital role in primary care in Brooklyn. The adoption of virtual consultations, particularly for follow-up appointments and medication management, can improve access to care and reduce the burden on patients. Practices that offer telehealth services should be recognized for their commitment to innovation and patient convenience.
Mental health resources are crucial in Brooklyn. The high stress levels and prevalence of mental health issues in urban environments necessitate readily available support. Primary care practices that integrate mental health services, such as on-site therapists or partnerships with mental health clinics, are providing comprehensive care. Access to mental health resources should be a primary factor in assessing the quality of primary care practices.
The analysis should also consider the availability of resources for specific populations, such as the elderly, individuals with disabilities, and those with limited English proficiency. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to serving these populations, through specialized programs and culturally sensitive care, should be recognized for their dedication.
In conclusion, both the Hattiesburg and Brooklyn analyses underscore the importance of a multi-faceted approach to evaluating healthcare quality. The assessments must consider physician-to-patient ratios, practice excellence, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. These factors, taken together, provide a comprehensive picture of the healthcare landscape and can inform patients' decisions about where to seek care.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in both areas, including the locations of medical facilities, physician density, and demographic data, consider using CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like
