The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 27581, Stem, North Carolina is 88 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 91.14 percent of the residents in 27581 has some form of health insurance. 39.54 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.24 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27581 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 868 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27581. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 499 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,990 health care providers accessible to residents in 27581, Stem, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27581, Stem, North Carolina
Prostate Cancer Score | 97 |
---|---|
People Score | 66 |
Provider Score | 88 |
Hospital Score | 64 |
Travel Score | 70 |
27581 | Stem | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 27581 & Primary Care in Stem
This analysis delves into the landscape of prostate cancer care within ZIP code 27581, focusing on the availability of primary care in the nearby town of Stem, North Carolina. We aim to provide a comprehensive "Prostate Cancer Score" assessment, considering various factors that impact patient access, quality of care, and overall well-being. This score, while not a numerical value, reflects the relative strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem in this specific geographic area.
The foundation of effective prostate cancer management rests on early detection and consistent primary care. In Stem, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is crucial. A robust PCP network facilitates regular screenings, provides initial diagnoses, and coordinates referrals to specialists. Conversely, a scarcity of PCPs can lead to delayed diagnoses, increased disease severity at presentation, and ultimately, poorer patient outcomes. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A higher ratio, indicating more patients per physician, often translates to longer wait times for appointments and potentially less personalized care. This impacts the timely detection and management of prostate cancer.
Within ZIP code 27581, the presence of urologists and oncologists is equally important. These specialists are the cornerstones of advanced prostate cancer treatment. Their availability, the quality of their facilities, and their adoption of cutting-edge technologies like robotic surgery and advanced imaging are significant factors. The presence of radiation oncologists, offering external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy, further enhances the treatment options available to patients. This concentration of specialists, their expertise, and their capacity to provide comprehensive care contribute significantly to the overall Prostate Cancer Score.
The quality of care extends beyond specialist availability. The adoption of telemedicine by both primary care physicians and specialists is a vital consideration. Telemedicine offers numerous benefits, including increased access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. It allows for virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and follow-up appointments, potentially reducing the burden on patients and improving adherence to treatment plans. The extent to which healthcare providers in 27581 and Stem embrace telemedicine significantly influences the overall score.
Furthermore, mental health resources play a crucial, often overlooked, role in prostate cancer care. A cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, who specialize in oncology, is paramount. These professionals provide crucial support to patients and their families, helping them cope with the emotional and psychological burdens of the disease. The accessibility of these resources is a critical component of a well-rounded care model.
Examining specific practices within the region allows for a more granular assessment. Identifying standout practices, those demonstrating excellence in patient care, early detection, and treatment outcomes, is essential. These practices often serve as models for other providers, fostering a culture of continuous improvement. Analyzing their patient satisfaction scores, their adherence to evidence-based guidelines, and their commitment to patient education provides valuable insights. This helps determine the relative strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem.
The physical infrastructure of healthcare facilities also impacts the score. Modern, well-equipped facilities with state-of-the-art diagnostic and treatment technologies contribute to a higher score. The availability of support services, such as patient navigators, support groups, and educational programs, further enhances the quality of care. These services help patients navigate the complexities of the healthcare system, providing them with the information and support they need.
A comprehensive Prostate Cancer Score analysis must also consider the availability of support services. Prostate cancer patients often benefit from access to support groups, patient navigators, and educational programs. These resources provide crucial emotional support, practical guidance, and access to the latest information about the disease. The presence of these services demonstrates a commitment to patient-centered care and contributes to a higher score.
The responsiveness of the healthcare system to patient needs is also a critical factor. This includes the ease of scheduling appointments, the availability of after-hours care, and the responsiveness of medical staff to patient inquiries. A healthcare system that is accessible, responsive, and patient-focused contributes to a higher score. This reflects the overall quality of care and the commitment of healthcare providers to meeting the needs of their patients.
The integration of data and technology is another key consideration. The use of electronic health records (EHRs) allows for better coordination of care, improved communication between providers, and more efficient management of patient information. The adoption of patient portals allows patients to access their medical records, communicate with their providers, and schedule appointments online. These technological advancements contribute to a more efficient and patient-centered healthcare system.
In conclusion, the Prostate Cancer Score for ZIP code 27581 and the surrounding areas, including Stem, is a complex assessment. It reflects the interplay of various factors, including primary care availability, specialist expertise, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the overall responsiveness of the healthcare system. While a definitive numerical score is not provided, the analysis highlights the importance of these factors in ensuring optimal prostate cancer care. The presence of robust primary care, accessible specialist care, a commitment to patient-centered care, and the integration of technology all contribute to a higher overall score.
To visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, facility locations, and other relevant data points, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps provide a powerful tool for understanding the healthcare landscape and identifying areas with potential gaps in care. CartoChrome maps offer a visual representation of the data, allowing you to explore the healthcare ecosystem in detail.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like