The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 27856, Nashville, North Carolina is 32 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 88.77 percent of the residents in 27856 has some form of health insurance. 37.58 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.93 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27856 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,182 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27856. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,654 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,301 health care providers accessible to residents in 27856, Nashville, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27856, Nashville, North Carolina
Prostate Cancer Score | 11 |
---|---|
People Score | 35 |
Provider Score | 32 |
Hospital Score | 16 |
Travel Score | 40 |
27856 | Nashville | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 27856 & Primary Care Availability in Nashville**
This analysis provides a comparative overview of prostate cancer care accessibility and primary care resources in two distinct geographic areas: ZIP Code 27856 (a specific area) and Nashville, Tennessee. The aim is to assess the quality of care, considering factors such as physician availability, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health support, all crucial components of a comprehensive approach to prostate cancer management.
**ZIP Code 27856: A Local Perspective**
Evaluating prostate cancer care within ZIP Code 27856 requires a granular approach, focusing on the specific medical landscape of the area. The first critical element is physician-to-patient ratio. This metric reveals the availability of urologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) relative to the population. A low ratio can indicate potential challenges in accessing timely consultations, screenings, and ongoing care. Researching the specific number of urologists and PCPs practicing within the ZIP code, alongside the area’s population data, will provide a foundational understanding of the physician-to-patient ratio. Public health resources, such as the local health department, can be a helpful resource in gathering this information.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care is also vital. Identifying standout practices within 27856 is crucial. This involves researching the reputation of medical facilities and physician practices. This includes evaluating their patient reviews, accreditations (e.g., from the American College of Surgeons), and the types of advanced treatments offered (e.g., robotic-assisted surgery, brachytherapy). Furthermore, looking into the practices' participation in clinical trials can indicate a commitment to cutting-edge treatments and research.
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. The availability of telehealth consultations, particularly for follow-up appointments, medication management, and mental health support, can significantly improve patient access to care, especially for those with mobility issues or living in more remote areas. Assessing the extent to which local practices offer telehealth services is essential. This includes determining the types of telehealth platforms used, the availability of virtual consultations, and the ease of scheduling these appointments.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in prostate cancer care, but they are critical. A prostate cancer diagnosis can be emotionally challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. Assessing the availability of mental health professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists) who specialize in oncology or men's health within the ZIP code is important. It is equally important to determine whether local practices have partnerships with mental health providers or offer in-house counseling services. The integration of mental health support can significantly improve patient well-being and adherence to treatment plans.
**Primary Care Availability in Nashville: A Broader View**
Shifting focus to Nashville, the analysis broadens to encompass the city's primary care landscape and its impact on prostate cancer care. Nashville's larger size and more diverse population require a different analytical approach. The physician-to-patient ratio remains a critical metric. However, the analysis must consider the city's overall demographics, including age distribution, socioeconomic factors, and the prevalence of prostate cancer risk factors. Public health data, such as information from the Tennessee Department of Health, can provide valuable insights into these factors.
Nashville's healthcare system is known for its concentration of medical facilities. Identifying the leading hospitals and clinics that specialize in urology and prostate cancer care is crucial. This involves researching their reputation, patient outcomes, and the range of services offered. The presence of academic medical centers, which often have access to the latest research and advanced treatments, can be a significant advantage for patients.
Telemedicine plays a crucial role in Nashville’s expansive healthcare landscape. Nashville's healthcare providers have a strong presence in the adoption of telehealth. This includes virtual consultations, remote monitoring of patients, and the use of digital tools to improve patient communication and education. Assessing the availability of telehealth services across different practices and hospitals is important.
Mental health resources are also important in Nashville. The city has a diverse range of mental health providers, including specialists in oncology and men's health. Assessing the availability of these resources, and their integration with prostate cancer care, is critical. This includes determining whether local practices have partnerships with mental health providers or offer in-house counseling services.
**Comparative Analysis and Conclusion**
Comparing the findings from ZIP Code 27856 and Nashville allows for a more nuanced understanding of prostate cancer care accessibility. While ZIP Code 27856 might face challenges due to a smaller population and potentially limited resources, Nashville's larger size and more diverse healthcare landscape may offer a wider range of options. However, Nashville’s size can also lead to longer wait times and more complex navigation of the healthcare system.
The ultimate goal of this analysis is to provide a comprehensive overview of prostate cancer care accessibility, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each location. By considering physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources, this analysis offers a valuable resource for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.
**Call to Action**
For a visual representation of these healthcare landscapes, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. These maps can visually display physician locations, hospital locations, and other relevant data points, providing a dynamic and insightful view of the healthcare resources in your area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like