27858, Greenville, North Carolina Prostate Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 27858, Greenville, North Carolina is 84 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.31 percent of the residents in 27858 has some form of health insurance. 19.43 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 79.34 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27858 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 12,293 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 124 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27858. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,699 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,047 health care providers accessible to residents in 27858, Greenville, North Carolina.

## Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Greenville, NC (ZIP Code 27858)

This analysis assesses the landscape of prostate cancer care within ZIP code 27858 (Greenville, NC) and the broader context of primary care availability, aiming to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available to men facing this diagnosis. The evaluation considers factors crucial for comprehensive care, including physician access, practice quality, technological integration, and mental health support.

The foundation of effective prostate cancer management rests on accessible and skilled medical professionals. Within Greenville, the physician-to-patient ratio for urologists, the specialists primarily responsible for prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, is a critical metric. While precise, publicly available data on this ratio for the specific ZIP code is often limited, analysis relies on regional averages and local healthcare network information. Generally, areas with higher ratios (more physicians per capita) indicate better access. A concerningly low ratio could signal potential delays in appointments, impacting early detection and timely intervention. This analysis will also assess the presence of general practitioners and their role in initial screenings and referrals.

Evaluating the quality of care involves scrutinizing the practices themselves. Factors considered include the use of advanced diagnostic tools like MRI fusion biopsies, the availability of minimally invasive surgical options (e.g., robotic-assisted prostatectomy), and the utilization of radiation therapy techniques like brachytherapy. Practices demonstrating a commitment to these technologies and approaches are generally considered to offer a higher standard of care. Additionally, the experience of the urologists, measured by years in practice and board certifications, contributes to the overall assessment. We will look for practices that actively participate in clinical trials, indicating a dedication to advancing prostate cancer treatment and offering patients access to cutting-edge therapies.

The adoption of telemedicine is another significant factor in evaluating the accessibility and convenience of care. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring, particularly beneficial for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices embracing telemedicine demonstrate a forward-thinking approach, enhancing patient convenience and potentially improving adherence to treatment plans. The availability of telehealth options, including the types of services offered (e.g., initial consultations, post-operative follow-ups), will be evaluated.

Beyond the purely medical aspects, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial component of comprehensive prostate cancer care. A diagnosis of prostate cancer can significantly impact a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. Practices that offer or readily refer patients to mental health professionals, support groups, or counseling services are demonstrating a commitment to holistic care. This analysis will assess the integration of mental health services within the healthcare ecosystem, including the availability of therapists specializing in oncology and the accessibility of support groups for patients and their families.

In Greenville, standout practices are likely to be those that combine a skilled team of urologists with advanced technology, a patient-centered approach, and a strong emphasis on mental health support. These practices will likely have a reputation for providing high-quality care and a positive patient experience. Identifying these practices involves analyzing patient reviews, assessing the range of services offered, and examining the practice’s commitment to continuous improvement. The presence of specialized nurses, patient navigators, and dedicated support staff further enhances the quality of care.

Primary care availability plays a critical role in prostate cancer detection. General practitioners are often the first point of contact for men experiencing symptoms or seeking routine screenings. The availability of primary care physicians in Greenville, therefore, directly impacts the early detection of prostate cancer. A shortage of primary care physicians could lead to delayed diagnoses and potentially poorer outcomes. This analysis will assess the density of primary care practices, their capacity to accept new patients, and their commitment to prostate cancer screening guidelines, including PSA testing and digital rectal exams.

Moreover, the integration of primary care and urology practices is essential for seamless patient care. Effective communication and collaboration between these specialties ensure that patients receive coordinated care, from initial screening and diagnosis to treatment and follow-up. We will assess the extent to which urology practices in Greenville have established referral pathways and collaborative relationships with primary care providers.

In conclusion, assessing the prostate cancer care landscape in Greenville (ZIP code 27858) requires a multi-faceted approach. It is a complex issue. It considers physician access, practice quality, technological integration, mental health support, and the availability of primary care. The quality of care is not just about the availability of medical services. It is also about the patient experience. The best practices in Greenville will be those that prioritize both. The analysis also highlights the importance of early detection, timely intervention, and comprehensive support for patients and their families.

To further explore the healthcare landscape in Greenville and gain a visual understanding of physician locations, practice locations, and other relevant data points, we recommend using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive, data-rich maps that can help you visualize and analyze the healthcare ecosystem in your area.