The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 28455, Nakina, North Carolina is 37 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.58 percent of the residents in 28455 has some form of health insurance. 40.98 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.64 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28455 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 745 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28455. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 371 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,707 health care providers accessible to residents in 28455, Nakina, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28455, Nakina, North Carolina
Prostate Cancer Score | 38 |
---|---|
People Score | 61 |
Provider Score | 37 |
Hospital Score | 54 |
Travel Score | 24 |
28455 | Nakina | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The task requires a complex analysis. I am unable to access real-time, dynamic information like doctor rankings, practice details, or telemedicine adoption rates specific to a ZIP code or town. Such data changes constantly. I can, however, provide a framework for how such an analysis *could* be constructed, outlining the key elements and considerations, and then offer a general concluding statement.
**Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: A Framework for ZIP Code 28455 (and Primary Care in Nakina)**
Analyzing the prostate cancer landscape in and around ZIP Code 28455 (likely encompassing Shallotte, NC, and surrounding areas) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis would not only assess the availability of primary care, which is critical for early detection and referral, but also evaluate the broader healthcare ecosystem's ability to support prostate cancer patients. This includes specialist access, diagnostic capabilities, treatment options, and supportive care services. The same principles apply to assessing primary care availability in Nakina, NC, though the scope is narrower.
**Physician-to-Patient Ratios and Primary Care Access**
A crucial starting point is understanding the physician-to-patient ratio within the target area. This involves determining the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and urologists practicing within the ZIP Code 28455 and the surrounding counties. Data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board, the American Medical Association (AMA), and local health departments can be used. This data would be compared to the population of the area to calculate a ratio. A lower ratio indicates potentially better access to care. For Nakina, the analysis focuses specifically on PCP availability within the town and its immediate vicinity. The analysis should also consider the age distribution of the population, as older populations typically have higher healthcare needs, particularly concerning prostate cancer.
**Standout Practices: Evaluating Quality and Services**
Identifying "standout practices" necessitates a deep dive into the services offered by individual clinics and hospitals. This involves researching the following:
* **Prostate Cancer Screening Programs:** Do practices actively promote and facilitate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and digital rectal exams? Are they following established guidelines for screening frequency and patient education?
* **Diagnostic Capabilities:** What advanced diagnostic tools are available locally? This includes access to MRI, ultrasound, and biopsy services. Are these services readily accessible, or are there significant wait times?
* **Treatment Options:** What treatment modalities are available? This includes surgery (e.g., robotic-assisted prostatectomy), radiation therapy (e.g., external beam radiation, brachytherapy), and hormonal therapy. The presence of a multidisciplinary team, including urologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists, is crucial.
* **Patient Education and Support:** Does the practice provide comprehensive patient education materials? Are there support groups or resources available for patients and their families?
* **Accreditation and Certifications:** Are the practices and hospitals accredited by reputable organizations (e.g., the American College of Surgeons, the Joint Commission)? Are the physicians board-certified?
**Telemedicine Adoption: Bridging the Gap**
Telemedicine can play a vital role in improving access to care, particularly in rural areas like Nakina and potentially in parts of the 28455 ZIP code area. The analysis should assess the extent of telemedicine adoption by local practices.
* **Telehealth Consultations:** Do PCPs and specialists offer virtual consultations for follow-up appointments, medication management, and patient education?
* **Remote Monitoring:** Are there programs for remote monitoring of patients, such as those undergoing hormonal therapy or post-treatment surveillance?
* **Technology Infrastructure:** Does the area have adequate internet connectivity to support telemedicine services?
**Mental Health Resources: A Crucial Component**
Prostate cancer can have a significant impact on a patient's mental health. The analysis must evaluate the availability of mental health resources.
* **Mental Health Professionals:** Are there psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists available in the area?
* **Counseling Services:** Do local hospitals or cancer centers offer counseling services for patients and their families?
* **Support Groups:** Are there support groups for prostate cancer patients and their partners?
* **Integration with Primary Care:** Are mental health services integrated into the primary care practices, facilitating referrals and coordinated care?
**Data Sources and Methodology**
Gathering the necessary data requires a multi-pronged approach:
* **Online Research:** Websites of hospitals, clinics, and physician practices.
* **Professional Organizations:** Websites of the American Urological Association, the American Cancer Society, and the National Cancer Institute.
* **Local Health Departments:** Public health data and reports.
* **Insurance Provider Directories:** Information on participating physicians and specialists.
* **Patient Reviews:** Online platforms like Healthgrades and Vitals (though these should be used with caution, as they may not always be representative).
The analysis would involve collecting and organizing the data, calculating relevant metrics (e.g., physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption rates), and comparing the findings to benchmarks and best practices. The final "Prostate Cancer Score" could be a composite score based on the various factors assessed, or a more nuanced assessment presenting the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape.
**Conclusion**
Creating a robust "Prostate Cancer Score" for the 28455 ZIP code and assessing primary care availability in Nakina demands a detailed investigation into healthcare resources, physician availability, and the adoption of innovative technologies. While I can provide the framework for such an analysis, the actual data collection and scoring require access to real-time, local information.
To visualize and analyze the healthcare landscape in these areas, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome can help you map healthcare resources, visualize physician distribution, and identify areas with limited access to care.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like