28610, Claremont, North Carolina Prostate Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 28610, Claremont, North Carolina is 46 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 88.55 percent of the residents in 28610 has some form of health insurance. 37.99 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 62.15 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28610 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,765 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 11 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28610. An estimate of 5 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,411 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,681 health care providers accessible to residents in 28610, Claremont, North Carolina.

## Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Claremont, NC (ZIP Code 28610)

Analyzing the landscape of prostate cancer care in Claremont, North Carolina (ZIP Code 28610) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers the availability of primary care, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of specialized urology practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive "Prostate Cancer Score" assessment, offering insights for patients and healthcare providers alike.

The foundation of effective prostate cancer care rests on accessible primary care. Claremont, as a relatively small community, presents both opportunities and challenges in this regard. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are often the first point of contact for men experiencing symptoms or seeking preventative screenings. The availability of PCPs directly impacts the early detection of prostate cancer, which is crucial for successful treatment outcomes. The geographical distribution of these physicians within the ZIP code, including their proximity to patient populations, is a key factor.

Physician-to-patient ratios offer a critical metric. A high ratio, indicating a limited number of doctors for a given population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially delayed diagnoses. Researching the specific physician-to-patient ratio within 28610, compared to state and national averages, is essential. This data, ideally broken down by specialty (primary care, urology), provides a clear picture of resource availability. Any shortages would necessitate strategies like incentivizing physician recruitment or expanding telehealth services.

Identifying standout practices is vital. This involves assessing the quality of care provided by individual practices and healthcare systems operating within the ZIP code. Factors to consider include the experience and expertise of the physicians, the availability of advanced diagnostic tools (e.g., MRI, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing), and the utilization of evidence-based treatment protocols. Patient reviews, accreditation status, and participation in clinical trials are further indicators of quality.

Telemedicine adoption plays an increasingly important role, particularly in rural or underserved areas. Telehealth can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to consult with specialists remotely, receive follow-up care, and participate in educational programs. Evaluating the extent to which practices in 28610 have embraced telemedicine, including the types of services offered and the platforms utilized, is crucial. This includes assessing the availability of secure video conferencing, remote monitoring capabilities, and patient access to digital health records.

The integration of mental health resources into prostate cancer care is often overlooked, but it is critically important. A prostate cancer diagnosis can have a significant emotional impact, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Assessing the availability of mental health services within the community, including access to therapists, counselors, and support groups, is essential. Furthermore, evaluating the extent to which primary care and urology practices screen patients for mental health concerns and provide referrals is a key component of a comprehensive "Prostate Cancer Score."

Specifics are key. Instead of generalities, the analysis must delve into the details. Are there any urology practices located within the ZIP code or nearby? What is the average wait time for an appointment with a PCP or a urologist? Are there any specific practices that are known for their expertise in prostate cancer treatment, such as minimally invasive surgery or radiation therapy? Is there a local chapter of a prostate cancer support group? What insurance plans are accepted by the majority of providers?

The analysis should also consider the demographics of the population within 28610. Prostate cancer disproportionately affects older men and certain ethnic groups. Understanding the age distribution and racial makeup of the community helps tailor the assessment to the specific needs of the patient population. This includes evaluating the availability of culturally sensitive care and outreach programs.

The "Prostate Cancer Score" should be a dynamic measure, reflecting the evolving healthcare landscape. Regular updates are necessary to account for changes in physician availability, technological advancements, and treatment protocols. The score should not be a single number, but rather a composite of several factors, each weighted according to its importance. This allows for a more nuanced understanding of the quality of care available.

For example, the score might include metrics such as: the physician-to-patient ratio, the percentage of PCPs who offer prostate cancer screening, the availability of advanced imaging techniques, the adoption rate of telemedicine, the availability of mental health support, and patient satisfaction scores. Each metric would be assigned a weight based on its relative importance, and the overall score would be calculated based on the weighted average.

The analysis should also consider the impact of external factors, such as the availability of transportation and the socioeconomic status of the community. These factors can significantly impact access to care and treatment outcomes. A comprehensive assessment must take these factors into account to provide a truly accurate picture of the prostate cancer care landscape in Claremont.

In conclusion, a thorough "Prostate Cancer Score" analysis for Claremont, NC (ZIP Code 28610) requires a detailed examination of primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of specialized practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The analysis must be specific, data-driven, and regularly updated to reflect the changing healthcare environment. It should provide valuable insights for patients seeking care and for healthcare providers striving to improve their services.

To visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, patient demographics, and other relevant data points within Claremont and surrounding areas, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can help you gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape and make informed decisions about your health.