28740, Green Mountain, North Carolina Prostate Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 28740, Green Mountain, North Carolina is 25 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.24 percent of the residents in 28740 has some form of health insurance. 49.94 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.02 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28740 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 182 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28740. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 521 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,485 health care providers accessible to residents in 28740, Green Mountain, North Carolina.

**Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Green Mountain, NC (ZIP Code 28740)**

Analyzing the landscape of prostate cancer care within Green Mountain, North Carolina, necessitates a multifaceted approach. We must consider not only the availability of medical professionals but also the broader healthcare infrastructure, particularly primary care access, and the integration of modern technologies. This analysis will delve into these aspects, providing a "Prostate Cancer Score" assessment, though it's important to acknowledge that a definitive numerical score is challenging to derive due to the complexities involved.

The foundation of effective prostate cancer care rests on the availability of qualified physicians. In ZIP Code 28740, the presence of urologists is paramount. The ratio of urologists to the population is a critical indicator. A higher ratio generally suggests better access to specialized care. However, the actual number of practicing urologists within this specific ZIP code must be determined through direct research. Publicly available databases, such as those maintained by the American Medical Association or state medical boards, can provide this data. Furthermore, the proximity of specialists in neighboring areas, such as Asheville or Johnson City, should be considered.

Beyond urologists, the presence of primary care physicians (PCPs) is crucial. PCPs often serve as the initial point of contact for men experiencing symptoms suggestive of prostate cancer. They are responsible for initial screenings, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests, and can refer patients to specialists when necessary. The PCP-to-patient ratio in Green Mountain is a key factor. A higher ratio, indicating greater availability of PCPs, is generally favorable. Investigating the patient load of each practice will give a more accurate picture.

Primary care availability in Green Mountain is a critical factor. The geographical distribution of primary care practices within the community is essential. Are practices conveniently located, or do residents face significant travel distances to access care? The hours of operation of these practices, including evening and weekend availability, also play a role in accessibility. Furthermore, the acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid, is a vital consideration.

The quality of care provided by the existing practices is also important. This involves assessing the use of evidence-based guidelines for prostate cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Are practices adhering to recommendations from organizations like the American Urological Association? Information on this can be gleaned from practice websites, patient reviews, and, if available, publicly reported quality metrics.

Standout practices within the area deserve specific attention. These practices might be distinguished by their commitment to patient education, their use of advanced diagnostic techniques, or their integration of supportive services. Identifying these practices often requires a combination of research, including online reviews, peer recommendations, and perhaps even direct contact with local healthcare providers.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element. The ability to consult with specialists remotely can significantly enhance access to care, particularly for residents in rural areas like Green Mountain. The availability of telehealth services, including virtual consultations and remote monitoring, can improve patient outcomes. Researching which practices offer telemedicine options and the types of services provided is crucial.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked aspect of prostate cancer care. A diagnosis of cancer can have a significant impact on a patient's mental and emotional well-being. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, and counselors, is therefore essential. Are these resources readily accessible within the community? Are there partnerships between medical practices and mental health providers? Understanding the availability of support groups, both in-person and online, is also important.

The integration of these factors – physician availability, primary care access, quality of care, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources – provides the basis for a "Prostate Cancer Score" assessment. However, it's important to reiterate that a precise numerical score is difficult to generate without comprehensive data. Instead, we can assess the overall landscape as favorable, moderate, or unfavorable.

In the case of Green Mountain, a thorough analysis would need to be conducted to determine the final assessment. This would involve gathering data on the factors discussed above and evaluating them in relation to the specific needs of the community.

A favorable score would indicate a robust healthcare infrastructure with ample access to specialists, high-quality primary care, and readily available support services. A moderate score would suggest some limitations, such as a shortage of specialists or limited telemedicine options. An unfavorable score would highlight significant challenges, such as a lack of access to care, poor quality of services, or a scarcity of mental health resources.

Ultimately, the goal of this analysis is to provide a comprehensive overview of the prostate cancer care landscape in Green Mountain. This information can be used to inform patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers about the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system. It can also help to identify areas where improvements are needed to ensure that all residents have access to the best possible care.

For a visual representation of this data, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a powerful way to visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, the geographical accessibility of care, and other relevant information. They can also be used to identify areas where access to care is limited and to highlight potential disparities in healthcare outcomes.