Health Scores Near 28772, Rosman, North Carolina
You may also like
The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 28772, Rosman, North Carolina is 84 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 71.05 percent of the residents in 28772 has some form of health insurance. 37.09 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 51.09 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28772 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 168 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28772. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 229 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 472 health care providers accessible to residents in 28772, Rosman, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28772, Rosman, North Carolina
| Prostate Cancer Score | 96 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 88 |
| Provider Score | 84 |
| Hospital Score | 63 |
| Travel Score | 47 |
| 28772 | Rosman | North Carolina | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Rosman, NC (ZIP Code 28772)
This analysis provides a Prostate Cancer Score assessment for primary care physicians within the 28772 ZIP code, focusing on their capacity to address prostate cancer screening, diagnosis, and patient support. The assessment considers factors impacting access to care, including physician availability, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The goal is to offer a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape in Rosman, NC, to empower residents with information for informed healthcare decisions.
The foundation of this analysis rests on the principle that early detection significantly improves prostate cancer outcomes. Therefore, the quality of primary care, the first point of contact for many patients, is paramount. This analysis evaluates the healthcare ecosystem, not just individual physicians, to provide a comprehensive view.
**Physician-to-Patient Ratio and Access to Care**
Rosman, North Carolina, is a rural community. A critical factor in evaluating healthcare access is the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio suggests potential challenges in securing timely appointments, particularly for preventative screenings like prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests and digital rectal exams. Publicly available data, such as that from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), is essential for understanding this ratio. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, would negatively impact the Prostate Cancer Score.
Beyond the raw number of physicians, the availability of specialists, such as urologists, is crucial. While primary care physicians initiate screenings, timely access to specialists for diagnosis and treatment is vital. The geographical proximity to urology specialists and the ease of referral processes are considered. Long travel distances or cumbersome referral systems would diminish the overall score.
**Standout Practices and Their Contributions**
Identifying standout practices involves looking beyond the basic metrics. Practices that actively promote prostate cancer awareness through patient education materials, regular screening reminders, and community outreach initiatives receive higher scores. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient risk factors, manage screening schedules, and facilitate communication with specialists are also highly valued.
The adoption of patient-centered care models, where the patient is actively involved in decision-making, is another key indicator. Practices that foster open communication, provide clear explanations of diagnostic procedures and treatment options, and address patient concerns effectively are prioritized. Furthermore, practices that actively participate in clinical trials or research related to prostate cancer treatment and prevention demonstrate a commitment to advancing patient care.
**Telemedicine Adoption and its Impact**
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas. Practices that offer telehealth consultations for follow-up appointments, medication management, and patient education improve access to care. This is particularly relevant for patients who may face challenges in traveling to the clinic.
The availability of telehealth services for prostate cancer screening follow-up, such as discussing PSA results or reviewing imaging reports, is a positive factor. Practices that utilize secure platforms for communication and patient data privacy demonstrate a commitment to patient safety and data security. The ease of use and accessibility of these telehealth services are also considered.
**Mental Health Resources and Holistic Care**
A crucial, often overlooked, aspect of prostate cancer care is the integration of mental health resources. A cancer diagnosis can significantly impact a patient's emotional well-being. Practices that recognize this and offer access to mental health professionals, such as therapists or counselors, receive higher scores.
The availability of support groups, both in-person and online, is another positive indicator. These groups provide a platform for patients to connect with others who have similar experiences, share information, and receive emotional support. Practices that actively refer patients to these resources demonstrate a commitment to holistic care. The integration of mental health services into the overall treatment plan is considered.
**Prostate Cancer Score: A Holistic Approach**
The Prostate Cancer Score is not a single number but a composite assessment. It considers the factors discussed above, weighing each based on its impact on patient outcomes and access to care. Practices demonstrating a strong commitment to early detection, patient education, comprehensive care, and the integration of mental health resources will receive higher scores.
The score is dynamic and can change based on evolving healthcare practices and advancements in prostate cancer treatment. This analysis provides a snapshot of the current healthcare landscape in Rosman, NC, and serves as a starting point for further investigation and informed decision-making.
**Conclusion**
The healthcare landscape in Rosman, NC, presents both opportunities and challenges regarding prostate cancer care. The physician-to-patient ratio, specialist availability, and telemedicine adoption are critical factors influencing access to care. Practices that prioritize patient education, early detection, and the integration of mental health resources are best positioned to provide optimal care. This analysis provides a framework for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in Rosman, empowering residents to make informed choices about their health.
**Call to Action**
To further explore the healthcare landscape in Rosman, NC, and visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations and specialist availability, we recommend utilizing the interactive mapping tools provided by CartoChrome. These maps offer a valuable resource for understanding the local healthcare environment and making informed healthcare decisions.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like
