The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 15739, Ernest, Pennsylvania is 43 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.80 percent of the residents in 15739 has some form of health insurance. 52.32 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 61.86 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15739 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 88 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15739. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 74 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,462 health care providers accessible to residents in 15739, Ernest, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15739, Ernest, Pennsylvania
Prostate Cancer Score | 57 |
---|---|
People Score | 75 |
Provider Score | 43 |
Hospital Score | 49 |
Travel Score | 35 |
15739 | Ernest | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Prostate cancer, a significant health concern for men, demands proactive screening and accessible care. This analysis delves into the landscape of prostate cancer care within ZIP Code 15739, encompassing Ernest, Pennsylvania, and assesses the availability of primary care physicians, a crucial element in early detection and ongoing management. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement.
The physician-to-patient ratio in Ernest and the surrounding areas is a critical starting point. A low ratio can indicate limited access to care, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses and treatment. Data from reputable sources, such as the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the U.S. Census Bureau, must be consulted to determine the actual physician-to-patient ratio within ZIP Code 15739. This ratio should be compared to state and national averages to gauge the relative availability of primary care physicians. A shortage of primary care physicians could necessitate longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying prostate cancer screenings and follow-up care.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality and accessibility of primary care practices are essential. Identifying standout practices within the ZIP Code requires evaluating factors such as patient reviews, the range of services offered, and the adoption of technology. Practices that prioritize preventative care, including regular prostate cancer screenings (PSA tests and digital rectal exams), and offer comprehensive care are highly desirable. Furthermore, practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans and offer flexible appointment scheduling, including evening and weekend hours, enhance accessibility.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial aspect of modern healthcare delivery. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, especially for follow-up appointments and medication management, can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility issues or those living in rural areas. Assessing the extent to which primary care practices in 15739 utilize telemedicine platforms is vital. Practices that embrace telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and can potentially mitigate the impact of a limited physician pool.
The mental health of prostate cancer patients is often overlooked, yet it plays a vital role in their overall well-being and treatment outcomes. Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. The availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is therefore a crucial component of a comprehensive prostate cancer care system. Assessing the presence of these resources within the community and their integration with primary care practices is essential. Practices that offer on-site mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care.
To provide a comprehensive prostate cancer score analysis, we need to consider the following specific elements. The analysis should identify the primary care practices within 15739. For each practice, we need to determine the number of physicians, the types of services offered (e.g., PSA testing, digital rectal exams, referrals to urologists), the insurance plans accepted, and the availability of telemedicine services. Patient reviews from reliable sources (e.g., Healthgrades, Vitals) should be analyzed to gauge patient satisfaction and identify any recurring themes. Furthermore, the analysis must assess the availability of mental health resources within the community, including the presence of therapists, counselors, and support groups. The proximity of these resources to primary care practices is also a factor.
The analysis should also consider the demographics of the population served by the primary care practices. The prevalence of prostate cancer varies among different ethnic groups. Understanding the demographic makeup of the patient population can help assess whether healthcare providers are adequately addressing the needs of all patients.
The prostate cancer score should be based on a weighted system that considers the factors discussed above. The physician-to-patient ratio, the quality and accessibility of primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources should all be assigned weights based on their relative importance. The practices should then be ranked based on their scores, with higher scores indicating a more favorable environment for prostate cancer care.
The analysis should identify any gaps in care and make recommendations for improvement. For example, if the physician-to-patient ratio is low, the analysis might recommend strategies to attract more physicians to the area. If telemedicine adoption is limited, the analysis might suggest ways to encourage practices to adopt telemedicine platforms. If mental health resources are scarce, the analysis might recommend initiatives to increase the availability of mental health services.
The goal of this prostate cancer score analysis is to provide a clear and concise assessment of the healthcare environment in 15739, with a focus on prostate cancer care. The analysis should be easily understandable by patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It should serve as a valuable tool for improving access to care, promoting early detection, and enhancing the overall well-being of men affected by prostate cancer. The analysis should be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.
This detailed assessment, while complex, offers a framework for understanding the healthcare landscape in 15739. It emphasizes the importance of accessible primary care, technological advancements, and comprehensive patient support. The analysis is not a simple checklist but a dynamic evaluation that considers the interconnectedness of various healthcare components.
To visualize this information, and to further understand the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of physician locations, practice characteristics, and other relevant data, allowing for a more intuitive understanding of the healthcare environment.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like