Prostate Cancer Score

16102, New Castle, Pennsylvania Prostate Cancer Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 16102, New Castle, Pennsylvania

The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 16102, New Castle, Pennsylvania is 63 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.10 percent of the residents in 16102 has some form of health insurance. 52.36 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.96 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16102 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,297 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 8 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16102. An estimate of 12 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,118 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,327 health care providers accessible to residents in 16102, New Castle, Pennsylvania.

Health Scores in 16102, New Castle, Pennsylvania

Prostate Cancer Score 41
People Score 19
Provider Score 63
Hospital Score 41
Travel Score 57

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

16102 New Castle Pennsylvania
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 16102, New Castle, Pennsylvania

The analysis below assesses the prostate cancer care landscape within ZIP code 16102, focusing on primary care availability and related factors, aiming to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment in New Castle, Pennsylvania. This evaluation considers physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support, all crucial elements in a comprehensive prostate cancer care framework.

Evaluating the healthcare ecosystem begins with understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. A favorable ratio, indicating a higher concentration of physicians per capita, generally translates to easier access to care and potentially shorter wait times for appointments. Conversely, a lower ratio can create barriers to timely diagnosis and treatment, especially for specialized care like urology, which is central to prostate cancer management. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Pennsylvania Department of Health, combined with information from professional medical directories and insurance provider networks, are essential in calculating this ratio accurately. The analysis must consider the number of practicing primary care physicians, urologists, and oncologists within the ZIP code and compare it to the population size. Any disparities in the ratio, especially regarding specialists, should be noted.

Beyond the raw numbers, the characteristics of primary care practices significantly impact the quality and accessibility of prostate cancer care. The analysis must examine the size and structure of these practices. Are they solo practices, small group practices, or part of larger healthcare systems? Larger systems often have more resources, including advanced diagnostic equipment and a broader network of specialists. The presence of on-site laboratory services and imaging capabilities, such as X-rays and potentially even ultrasound, streamlines the diagnostic process. Furthermore, the practices' affiliations with hospitals and cancer centers are critical. Strong affiliations facilitate seamless referrals, collaborative care, and access to cutting-edge treatments, including radiation therapy and surgical interventions.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The rise of telemedicine has the potential to significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural or underserved areas. The analysis should evaluate the extent to which primary care practices and specialists in 16102 offer telemedicine consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring services. This includes assessing the availability of virtual visits for initial consultations, medication management, and post-treatment care. The availability of secure online patient portals for accessing medical records, test results, and communicating with healthcare providers is also important. The integration of telemedicine can reduce travel time, minimize exposure to potential infections, and improve patient convenience, all of which are particularly relevant for individuals managing chronic conditions like prostate cancer.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but crucial aspect of prostate cancer care. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The analysis must assess the availability of mental health support services within the community. This includes the presence of psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors who specialize in oncology or have experience working with cancer patients. The integration of mental health services into primary care practices and cancer treatment centers is also important. This can involve offering on-site counseling, providing referrals to mental health professionals, and promoting awareness of mental health resources. The availability of support groups, both in-person and online, can provide patients with a valuable opportunity to connect with others who are facing similar challenges.

Identifying standout practices within 16102 requires a deeper dive into their specific offerings and patient outcomes. This involves examining patient reviews, assessing the practice's commitment to patient education and shared decision-making, and evaluating its participation in quality improvement initiatives. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, provide comprehensive information about treatment options, and prioritize patient satisfaction are generally considered to be of higher quality. Examining data on cancer screening rates, treatment success rates, and patient survival rates, where available, can provide further insights into the quality of care provided by different practices. The analysis should also consider the practice's commitment to cultural sensitivity and its ability to provide care to a diverse patient population.

The analysis needs to account for the impact of insurance coverage on access to care. The acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance, is essential for ensuring that patients can afford the care they need. The analysis should assess the practices' participation in different insurance networks and their willingness to work with patients to navigate the complexities of insurance coverage. The availability of financial assistance programs and patient advocacy services can also be crucial for helping patients manage the costs of cancer care.

In the context of New Castle, Pennsylvania, specific considerations are paramount. The socioeconomic demographics of the area, including income levels, education levels, and access to transportation, can significantly influence healthcare access and outcomes. The analysis should consider these factors and their potential impact on prostate cancer care. The availability of public transportation and the proximity of healthcare facilities to residential areas are also important considerations, especially for patients with limited mobility or transportation options.

The evaluation of primary care availability in 16102 requires a comprehensive approach. It is not enough to simply count the number of physicians. The analysis must consider the quality of care, the accessibility of services, the integration of technology, and the availability of mental health support. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment, highlighting strengths and weaknesses, and identifying areas where improvements are needed. This detailed assessment is essential for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers alike.

To visualize the complex interplay of these factors and gain a dynamic understanding of the healthcare landscape in 16102 and beyond, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers interactive maps that can visualize physician distribution, practice locations, telemedicine availability, and other critical data points. These maps can help you identify areas with high or low access to care, pinpoint potential gaps in services, and make informed decisions about your healthcare.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 16102, New Castle, Pennsylvania

You may also like

16101, New Castle, Pennsylvania
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 16102: 3.97 Miles

Total Population:

16112, Bessemer, Pennsylvania
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 16102: 4.69 Miles

Total Population:

16116, Edinburg, Pennsylvania
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 16102: 5.15 Miles

Total Population:

16132, Hillsville, Pennsylvania
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 16102: 5.38 Miles

Total Population:

16105, New Castle, Pennsylvania
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 16102: 5.51 Miles

Total Population:

16120, Enon Valley, Pennsylvania
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 16102: 6.64 Miles

Total Population:

16141, New Galilee, Pennsylvania
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 16102: 8.45 Miles

Total Population:

16143, Pulaski, Pennsylvania
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 16102: 9.73 Miles

Total Population:

16136, Koppel, Pennsylvania
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 16102: 10.17 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 16102, New Castle, Pennsylvania