16113, Clark, Pennsylvania Prostate Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 16113, Clark, Pennsylvania is 61 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.29 percent of the residents in 16113 has some form of health insurance. 33.88 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.96 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16113 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 52 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16113. An estimate of 3 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 95 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,744 health care providers accessible to residents in 16113, Clark, Pennsylvania.

## Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Clark, PA (ZIP Code 16113)

This analysis provides a detailed assessment of healthcare resources relevant to prostate cancer care within ZIP Code 16113 (Clark, Pennsylvania), focusing on primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. This evaluation aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the local healthcare landscape and its capacity to support men facing prostate cancer.

Clark, Pennsylvania, a small community, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare access. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a crucial starting point for early detection and ongoing management of prostate cancer. PCPs often serve as the initial point of contact, facilitating screenings, referrals to specialists, and coordinating overall care. The density of PCPs relative to the population directly impacts access. A low physician-to-patient ratio can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial screenings and interventions. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility and improved patient outcomes.

Within ZIP Code 16113, it is essential to identify the specific number of practicing PCPs. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and professional medical directories can be used to determine the number of PCPs actively serving the community. Combining this data with the population of Clark allows for calculating the physician-to-patient ratio. This ratio provides a quantitative measure of access, highlighting potential gaps in care.

Furthermore, the geographical distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code is critical. Are the practices concentrated in one area, or are they dispersed throughout the community? This affects the ease of access for residents, particularly those with mobility limitations or limited transportation options. Analyzing the physical locations of practices, along with their proximity to public transportation and other community resources, paints a more complete picture of accessibility.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality and breadth of services offered by local primary care practices are vital. Are the practices accepting new patients? Do they offer extended hours or weekend appointments to accommodate different schedules? Do they have established relationships with urologists and other specialists who treat prostate cancer? These factors contribute to the overall patient experience and the effectiveness of care coordination.

Identifying standout practices within the community involves assessing their commitment to patient-centered care. This includes evaluating their use of electronic health records (EHRs), which facilitate seamless information sharing between providers, and their adoption of patient portals, which empower patients to access their medical information and communicate with their care teams. Practices that prioritize preventive care, including regular prostate cancer screenings, and provide comprehensive patient education are particularly valuable.

Telemedicine has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare, especially in rural areas like Clark. The adoption of telemedicine by local primary care practices can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients who have difficulty traveling to appointments. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, and online access to educational materials. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption within the community is crucial. Are practices offering virtual appointments? Do they have the necessary technology and infrastructure to support telemedicine services?

Mental health is an often-overlooked but critical aspect of prostate cancer care. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional well-being. Anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges are common. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the community is essential. Do local primary care practices have integrated mental health services? Are they collaborating with mental health professionals to provide comprehensive care? Are there local support groups or counseling services available for men with prostate cancer and their families?

The integration of mental health services within primary care practices can significantly improve patient outcomes. Co-locating mental health professionals with PCPs facilitates easier referrals and promotes a more holistic approach to care. This integrated model recognizes the interconnectedness of physical and mental health and provides patients with comprehensive support.

Assessing the availability of mental health resources involves identifying local therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists who specialize in oncology or men's health. It also includes evaluating the accessibility of these services, considering factors such as insurance coverage, appointment availability, and location. Community-based organizations and support groups can also play a vital role in providing emotional support and peer-to-peer connections.

The overall assessment of healthcare resources within ZIP Code 16113 should consider the interplay of all these factors. A high physician-to-patient ratio, coupled with a strong adoption of telemedicine and integrated mental health services, suggests a more robust healthcare infrastructure. Conversely, a low physician-to-patient ratio, limited telemedicine adoption, and a lack of mental health resources could indicate significant challenges in accessing and receiving comprehensive care.

By analyzing these factors, this assessment aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the healthcare landscape in Clark, Pennsylvania, and its capacity to support men facing prostate cancer. The information can be used to identify areas for improvement, advocate for increased resources, and ultimately, improve the quality of care for patients.

This analysis is a starting point for understanding the healthcare landscape in Clark, PA. Further investigation, including direct contact with local primary care practices and community organizations, is recommended to gain a more detailed and nuanced understanding.