Health Scores Near 16344, Rouseville, Pennsylvania
You may also like
The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 16344, Rouseville, Pennsylvania is 52 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.74 percent of the residents in 16344 has some form of health insurance. 60.04 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 54.49 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16344 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 143 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16344. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 57 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 985 health care providers accessible to residents in 16344, Rouseville, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16344, Rouseville, Pennsylvania
| Prostate Cancer Score | 57 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 43 |
| Provider Score | 52 |
| Hospital Score | 64 |
| Travel Score | 43 |
| 16344 | Rouseville | Pennsylvania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below assesses the landscape of prostate cancer care and primary care availability in Rouseville, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 16344). This evaluation considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and access to mental health resources, all crucial elements in determining the quality and accessibility of healthcare within the community.
**Prostate Cancer Score Analysis for Doctors in ZIP Code 16344**
Evaluating prostate cancer care necessitates a multi-faceted approach, recognizing that early detection and effective treatment are paramount. The primary focus here is on the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs), as they often serve as the initial point of contact for men seeking prostate health screenings and guidance. The availability of urologists, specialists in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate conditions, is also crucial.
Unfortunately, a direct, comprehensive “Prostate Cancer Score” for doctors in 16344 is difficult to generate with precision due to the limitations of publicly available data. However, we can infer a relative score based on the factors we can assess.
**Physician-to-Patient Ratios and Primary Care Availability**
Accurate physician-to-patient ratios are vital. The ideal scenario involves a sufficient number of PCPs to serve the population, ensuring timely access to appointments and preventative care, including prostate screenings. The current population of Rouseville, combined with the number of practicing PCPs within the ZIP code or its immediate vicinity, provides a baseline. If the ratio is unfavorable (e.g., a high number of patients per physician), access to care may be compromised. This can lead to delayed diagnoses and less effective management of prostate health concerns. Further investigation into the availability of specialists, such as urologists, is critical. The presence of a urologist within a reasonable driving distance significantly improves the overall score.
**Standout Practices and Their Impact**
Identifying standout practices involves assessing several key elements. These include the reputation of the practice, the experience of the physicians, the availability of advanced diagnostic equipment (e.g., MRI machines), and the integration of patient-centered care models. Practices that prioritize preventative care, offer comprehensive screening programs, and provide clear communication with patients typically receive higher marks. The presence of a dedicated prostate cancer support group or access to educational resources further enhances a practice's score. The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and the ability to share patient information seamlessly with other healthcare providers are also important.
**Telemedicine Adoption: A Critical Consideration**
Telemedicine has become increasingly important, particularly in rural areas where access to care can be challenging. The availability of telehealth services, enabling virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and follow-up appointments, significantly improves the accessibility of care. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments for initial consultations, follow-up visits, and medication management, receive higher scores. The ability to offer telehealth services can be particularly beneficial for patients with mobility issues or those living in remote locations.
**Mental Health Resources: A Vital Component**
Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment can have a significant impact on a patient's mental and emotional well-being. The availability of mental health resources, such as access to therapists, counselors, and support groups, is a critical component of comprehensive care. Practices that collaborate with mental health professionals or offer in-house counseling services receive higher scores. The ability to address the psychological aspects of prostate cancer, including anxiety, depression, and body image concerns, is essential for promoting overall patient well-being.
**Primary Care Availability in Rouseville: A Deeper Dive**
Evaluating primary care availability in Rouseville requires a more in-depth look at the local healthcare infrastructure. This includes assessing the number of PCPs practicing within the town, the types of services they offer, and their patient load. The presence of a local hospital or clinic is also an important factor. This provides access to a broader range of medical services and diagnostic capabilities.
**Specific Considerations for Rouseville**
Rouseville, being a smaller community, may face unique challenges in accessing healthcare. These challenges include a potentially limited number of PCPs, longer travel distances to specialists, and a lack of readily available mental health resources. The analysis should consider the availability of transportation options for patients, particularly those with mobility issues or those who live in more remote areas.
**Assessing the Score: A Relative Grading**
Based on the factors discussed, a relative score can be assigned. This score is not a definitive ranking but rather an estimation of the overall quality and accessibility of prostate cancer care and primary care availability. Practices and the community will be graded on the following:
* **Physician Availability:** The number of PCPs and specialists available to the population.
* **Practice Characteristics:** The reputation of the practice, physician experience, and the availability of advanced diagnostic equipment.
* **Telemedicine Adoption:** The availability of telehealth services.
* **Mental Health Resources:** The availability of mental health support.
**Concluding Remarks**
The healthcare landscape in Rouseville presents both opportunities and challenges. While the community may face limitations in access to care due to its size and location, the presence of dedicated healthcare professionals and the adoption of innovative technologies, such as telemedicine, can improve the overall quality of care. The availability of mental health resources is also crucial for providing comprehensive support to patients.
**Call to Action**
To gain a more detailed understanding of the healthcare landscape in Rouseville and surrounding areas, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive maps that visualize healthcare data, including physician locations, hospital locations, and other relevant information. This can help you identify healthcare providers, assess accessibility, and make informed decisions about your healthcare needs.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like
