The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 16546, Erie, Pennsylvania is 91 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 99.60 percent of the residents in 16546 has some form of health insurance. 3.01 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 98.49 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16546 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 327 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 10 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16546. An estimate of 6 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 7,027 health care providers accessible to residents in 16546, Erie, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16546, Erie, Pennsylvania
Prostate Cancer Score | 93 |
---|---|
People Score | 56 |
Provider Score | 91 |
Hospital Score | 62 |
Travel Score | 61 |
16546 | Erie | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
This analysis delves into the landscape of prostate cancer care within ZIP code 16546, focusing on physician availability, practice characteristics, and the broader healthcare ecosystem in Erie, Pennsylvania. It considers factors crucial for patients navigating diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health support.
The cornerstone of effective prostate cancer management is access to qualified medical professionals. In assessing the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) and urologists within 16546, we must consider the physician-to-patient ratio. This ratio, the number of physicians per 1,000 residents, provides a crucial indicator of accessibility. A higher ratio generally suggests greater ease in securing appointments and receiving timely care. Data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and relevant professional organizations are essential to determine the current physician-to-patient ratios within the specified ZIP code and the broader Erie area. Publicly available data, such as that from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), provides valuable insights into physician shortages and areas of need.
Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of physicians matters. Are PCPs and urologists clustered in specific areas within 16546, or are they dispersed throughout the community? This geographical analysis is critical for understanding access, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in underserved areas. The presence of hospitals, specialized cancer centers, and comprehensive healthcare systems within and near 16546 also significantly impacts access to care. These facilities often house multidisciplinary teams, including urologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and support staff, providing a holistic approach to prostate cancer treatment.
Identifying standout practices requires evaluating several factors. These include the experience and expertise of the physicians, the availability of advanced diagnostic and treatment technologies, and patient satisfaction scores. Practices that offer a comprehensive range of services, from screening and diagnosis to surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, are particularly valuable. Furthermore, practices that participate in clinical trials and research initiatives demonstrate a commitment to advancing prostate cancer care. Patient reviews, online ratings, and testimonials provide crucial insights into the quality of care and the patient experience.
Telemedicine has emerged as a vital tool for expanding access to healthcare, particularly in rural or underserved areas. The adoption of telemedicine technologies by practices in 16546 is an important factor to consider. Telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits and improving convenience for patients. The availability of telemedicine services can be particularly beneficial for patients undergoing treatment or managing chronic conditions. Practices that offer telemedicine options demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care and leveraging technology to enhance access.
The emotional and psychological impact of a prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment cannot be overstated. The availability of mental health resources is a critical component of comprehensive care. Practices that integrate mental health services into their treatment plans are better equipped to support patients' well-being. This includes access to therapists, counselors, and support groups specializing in cancer care. Collaboration between urologists, oncologists, and mental health professionals ensures a coordinated approach to addressing the emotional and psychological needs of patients.
In Erie, the broader availability of mental health resources is also crucial. The presence of mental health clinics, hospitals with psychiatric units, and community-based support organizations contributes to a robust healthcare ecosystem. Public health initiatives and programs that promote mental health awareness and provide access to mental health services can further enhance the quality of care for prostate cancer patients.
The integration of these factors – physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources – paints a comprehensive picture of prostate cancer care within 16546 and Erie. A detailed analysis should compare these factors with regional and national benchmarks to identify strengths and weaknesses. It should also consider the impact of socioeconomic factors, such as insurance coverage and access to transportation, on healthcare access.
This analysis is not a simple ranking; it is a nuanced assessment. It requires gathering and synthesizing data from various sources, including public health agencies, professional organizations, healthcare providers, and patient feedback. The goal is to provide a clear and informative overview of the healthcare landscape for prostate cancer patients in the specified area. This information empowers patients to make informed decisions about their care and advocate for improved access and quality of services.
The availability of data on prostate cancer care can vary. Publicly available data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) can provide valuable insights. Additionally, professional organizations, such as the American Urological Association (AUA), may offer data and resources related to prostate cancer care. Healthcare providers in the area may also provide information on their services and patient outcomes.
This analysis, while aiming to be comprehensive, is limited by the availability and accuracy of data. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, so it is crucial to regularly update this assessment to reflect changes in physician availability, practice characteristics, and the broader healthcare environment. The information presented should be considered as a starting point for further investigation and consultation with healthcare professionals.
For a deeper dive into the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, hospital locations, and the availability of support services, explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their platform provides detailed visualizations of healthcare data, enabling you to understand the spatial relationships between resources and the community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like