The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 17251, Roxbury, Pennsylvania is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 66.67 percent of the residents in 17251 has some form of health insurance. 28.57 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 48.81 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17251 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 21 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 7 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17251. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 16 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 8,149 health care providers accessible to residents in 17251, Roxbury, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17251, Roxbury, Pennsylvania
Prostate Cancer Score | 89 |
---|---|
People Score | 78 |
Provider Score | 74 |
Hospital Score | 66 |
Travel Score | 39 |
17251 | Roxbury | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 17251 & Roxbury Primary Care**
The assessment focuses on the quality of prostate cancer care and primary care accessibility within ZIP Code 17251 (Waynesboro, PA) and the availability of primary care resources in the nearby Roxbury area. This analysis considers factors crucial to patient outcomes, including physician availability, practice quality, technological integration, and the provision of mental health support. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape, specifically concerning prostate cancer diagnosis, treatment, and overall patient well-being.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator of healthcare accessibility. In 17251, the ratio of urologists to the general population is a primary concern. A shortage of specialists can lead to delayed diagnoses and treatment, negatively impacting patient outcomes. The analysis will examine the availability of urologists in the immediate area and the surrounding counties, considering travel times and potential bottlenecks in accessing specialized care. This assessment also considers the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs), who often serve as the initial point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms. A robust PCP network is vital for early detection and referral to specialists.
Standout practices are identified by their commitment to patient care, utilizing advanced diagnostic tools, and providing comprehensive treatment options. Practices that offer minimally invasive surgical techniques, radiation therapy, and access to clinical trials are given higher consideration. Reviews from patients and their families are essential in determining the quality of care. The assessment will analyze patient satisfaction scores, the availability of support groups, and the overall patient experience. Practices with a strong focus on patient education and proactive communication are also given high marks.
Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important, particularly in rural areas. The ability to consult with specialists remotely can significantly improve access to care, reducing the need for lengthy travel and wait times. The analysis will assess the extent to which practices in 17251 and the surrounding areas utilize telemedicine for consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring. Practices that embrace telehealth technologies are seen as more patient-centric and better equipped to serve the needs of a diverse population.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of cancer care, but they are integral to the well-being of patients. A prostate cancer diagnosis can be emotionally challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. The assessment will examine the availability of mental health services within the practices themselves or through referral networks. This includes access to therapists, counselors, and support groups specializing in cancer-related issues. Practices that prioritize mental health support demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care.
The Roxbury area, although not a specific ZIP code, is examined for its primary care resources. The analysis will evaluate the number of PCPs available, the types of services offered, and the accessibility of these services for residents. The proximity of Roxbury to Waynesboro and other towns in the region is considered, as it impacts access to healthcare. The study also assesses the availability of specialists and hospitals that Roxbury residents can easily access. This is crucial for patients needing referrals or emergency care.
The analysis considers the integration of technology in healthcare practices. This includes the use of electronic health records (EHRs), patient portals, and other digital tools. Practices that utilize EHRs effectively are better equipped to manage patient data, coordinate care, and communicate with patients efficiently. Patient portals allow patients to access their medical records, schedule appointments, and communicate with their healthcare providers online. The use of these technologies can improve patient engagement and satisfaction.
The evaluation also considers the availability of cancer screening programs and educational resources. Early detection is key to successful prostate cancer treatment. Practices that actively promote screening programs and provide educational materials about prostate cancer symptoms and risk factors are given a higher score. This proactive approach to patient care can lead to earlier diagnoses and improved outcomes. The presence of community outreach programs and partnerships with local organizations is also considered.
The analysis also takes into account the demographic characteristics of the population served by the practices. This includes factors such as age, race, and socioeconomic status. Practices that are culturally sensitive and responsive to the needs of a diverse patient population are given higher consideration. This includes providing services in multiple languages and addressing health disparities. The assessment also considers the availability of financial assistance programs for patients who may have difficulty affording care.
The overall score for each practice and the general healthcare landscape is determined based on a weighted average of the factors discussed above. The weighting of each factor reflects its importance in achieving optimal patient outcomes. The final score provides a comprehensive assessment of the quality of prostate cancer care and primary care accessibility in ZIP Code 17251 and the Roxbury area. This score can be used by patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare choices.
The analysis will also consider the availability of support services for patients and their families. This includes access to social workers, financial counselors, and other support staff. The availability of these resources can help patients navigate the challenges of a cancer diagnosis and treatment. The assessment also considers the presence of patient navigators who can help patients coordinate their care and access the resources they need.
The study will also evaluate the responsiveness of healthcare providers to patient needs. This includes the ability to schedule appointments in a timely manner, the ease of communication with healthcare providers, and the overall patient experience. Practices that prioritize patient satisfaction and provide excellent customer service are given higher consideration. The assessment also considers the availability of after-hours care and emergency services.
The analysis concludes with a summary of the key findings and recommendations for improving healthcare access and quality in the region. This includes suggestions for addressing any identified shortcomings, such as physician shortages or a lack of mental health resources. The recommendations are intended to inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations about ways to improve the healthcare landscape for patients with prostate cancer and those in need of primary care.
For a comprehensive visual representation of the healthcare landscape in ZIP Code 17251 and surrounding areas, including physician locations, practice details, and resource availability, explore CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like