18507, Moosic, Pennsylvania Prostate Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 18507, Moosic, Pennsylvania is 90 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 99.03 percent of the residents in 18507 has some form of health insurance. 38.80 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.83 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18507 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,165 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18507. An estimate of 5 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 989 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,994 health care providers accessible to residents in 18507, Moosic, Pennsylvania.

**Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 18507 and Primary Care Availability in Moosic**

This analysis delves into the landscape of prostate cancer care within ZIP Code 18507 (likely encompassing Scranton, Pennsylvania, and surrounding areas) and the broader primary care environment in Moosic, Pennsylvania. The goal is to provide a nuanced "Prostate Cancer Score," considering factors crucial for patient well-being, including physician access, quality of care, and support services. The analysis will focus on available data, acknowledging the limitations of publicly accessible information.

Assessing prostate cancer care requires a multi-faceted approach. It's not simply about the number of urologists; it encompasses the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) for initial screenings and referrals, the integration of mental health services, and the adoption of modern technologies like telemedicine. Furthermore, the geographic distribution of resources within the region plays a critical role in patient access.

**Physician-to-Patient Ratios and Access**

Determining precise physician-to-patient ratios requires access to detailed, proprietary data. Publicly available information often provides only general estimates. However, we can make informed observations. ZIP Code 18507, being part of a larger metropolitan area, likely has a more favorable physician-to-patient ratio than more rural locations. The presence of hospitals and medical centers in Scranton suggests a concentration of specialists, including urologists. The availability of PCPs in Moosic, a neighboring community, is vital for early detection and ongoing care. A robust primary care network is crucial for prostate cancer screening, monitoring, and coordinating care.

Access is not just about the number of doctors; it's about the ease with which patients can schedule appointments, the acceptance of various insurance plans, and the proximity of healthcare facilities. Long wait times for appointments and limited insurance coverage can create significant barriers to care. The geographical distribution of healthcare providers within 18507 and Moosic is also crucial. Are services concentrated in a few areas, or are they spread out to serve the entire population?

**Standout Practices and Quality of Care**

Identifying "standout practices" requires analyzing various factors. This includes physician credentials, experience, patient reviews, and the adoption of evidence-based practices. Hospitals and medical groups often publish information about their physicians, including board certifications and areas of specialization. Patient reviews, while subjective, can provide insights into patient experiences. The use of advanced diagnostic tools, such as MRI and genomic testing, is also an indicator of quality.

Practices that actively participate in clinical trials and research often demonstrate a commitment to staying at the forefront of medical advancements. The adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted prostatectomy, can also be a marker of quality. The integration of a multidisciplinary approach, involving urologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and other specialists, is crucial for comprehensive prostate cancer care.

**Telemedicine Adoption and its Impact**

Telemedicine has the potential to significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and the delivery of educational materials. The adoption of telemedicine technologies by practices in 18507 and Moosic can be a positive indicator. It suggests a willingness to embrace innovation and improve patient convenience.

Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for follow-up appointments, medication management, and providing support to patients undergoing treatment. However, the effectiveness of telemedicine depends on factors such as internet access, patient comfort with technology, and the ability to conduct thorough virtual examinations.

**Mental Health Resources and Support**

Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment can have a significant impact on a patient's mental and emotional well-being. Anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges are common. The availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is therefore a critical component of comprehensive care.

Practices that integrate mental health services into their care model demonstrate a commitment to addressing the holistic needs of their patients. This may include providing on-site counseling services, referrals to mental health professionals, or offering support groups specifically for prostate cancer patients and their families. The availability of these resources is an important factor in assessing the overall quality of care.

**Overall "Prostate Cancer Score" Considerations**

Based on the available information, the "Prostate Cancer Score" for 18507 and Moosic would be a composite score. It would consider physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of care provided by local practices, the adoption of telemedicine technologies, and the availability of mental health resources. The score would be relative, acknowledging that the healthcare landscape is constantly evolving.

The score would be lower if there were significant access barriers, such as long wait times for appointments or a shortage of specialists. It would be higher if practices demonstrated a commitment to quality, embraced technology, and provided comprehensive support services.

The score would also be influenced by the availability of primary care physicians in Moosic, as they play a vital role in early detection and ongoing care. A strong primary care network is essential for ensuring that patients receive timely screenings and referrals.

**Conclusion**

The healthcare landscape in 18507 and Moosic, like any region, is dynamic. Assessing the quality of prostate cancer care requires a multi-faceted approach, considering access, quality, technology adoption, and support services. While a precise "Prostate Cancer Score" requires more in-depth data, this analysis provides a framework for understanding the key factors that contribute to patient well-being.

To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in 18507 and Moosic, including the geographic distribution of healthcare providers and access points, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide valuable insights into physician locations, proximity to patients, and other relevant data points.