The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 02814, Chepachet, Rhode Island is 94 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 99.40 percent of the residents in 02814 has some form of health insurance. 27.01 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 88.03 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02814 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,730 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02814. An estimate of 5 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,200 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,566 health care providers accessible to residents in 02814, Chepachet, Rhode Island.
Health Scores in 02814, Chepachet, Rhode Island
Prostate Cancer Score | 94 |
---|---|
People Score | 72 |
Provider Score | 94 |
Hospital Score | 47 |
Travel Score | 62 |
02814 | Chepachet | Rhode Island | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of prostate cancer care within ZIP code 02814, encompassing Chepachet, Rhode Island, requires a multi-faceted approach. We must consider not only the availability of specialists but also the broader healthcare ecosystem, including primary care access, mental health support, and the integration of technology like telemedicine. This evaluation offers a nuanced perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape concerning prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment.
The cornerstone of effective prostate cancer care is early detection and consistent monitoring. This begins with a strong primary care foundation. In Chepachet, assessing primary care availability is crucial. The physician-to-patient ratio is a key indicator. A higher ratio, meaning fewer doctors per patient, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial screenings like prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests and digital rectal exams. Conversely, a lower ratio indicates better access, allowing for proactive care and timely interventions. The analysis should identify the number of primary care physicians practicing within the ZIP code and the surrounding areas, factoring in their patient load and appointment availability.
Beyond the numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. Are primary care physicians actively screening for prostate cancer in accordance with current guidelines? Do they have established referral pathways to urologists for patients with elevated PSA levels or suspicious findings? Assessing the integration of electronic health records (EHRs) can reveal a physician’s ability to coordinate care and share patient information seamlessly with specialists. The presence of certified patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) within the primary care practices would also be a positive indicator, demonstrating a commitment to comprehensive and coordinated patient care.
The availability of urologists is the next critical factor. Are there urologists practicing within the 02814 ZIP code, or do patients need to travel to nearby towns or cities like Providence or Smithfield for specialist consultations and treatment? The geographic proximity of specialists significantly impacts patient convenience and access to timely care. Analyzing the number of urologists, their specializations (e.g., robotic surgery, radiation oncology), and their patient load will help determine the capacity of the local healthcare system to handle prostate cancer cases.
Standout practices within the region should be identified. This includes practices known for their expertise in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. These practices might have a higher volume of patients, employ cutting-edge technologies like advanced imaging techniques (e.g., MRI fusion biopsy), or participate in clinical trials. Identifying these centers of excellence provides patients with information on where to seek the highest quality of care.
The adoption of telemedicine is another critical aspect of the evaluation. Telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients who live in rural areas or have mobility issues. Does the local healthcare system offer telemedicine consultations for prostate cancer-related appointments, such as follow-up visits or consultations with specialists? Telemedicine can also facilitate access to educational resources and support groups, improving patient outcomes and quality of life.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are an integral part of prostate cancer care. A cancer diagnosis can have a significant impact on a patient's emotional and psychological well-being. The analysis must assess the availability of mental health services within the community, including access to therapists, counselors, and support groups. Does the local healthcare system have established referral pathways to mental health professionals? Are mental health services integrated into the cancer care pathway? Addressing the mental health needs of patients can improve their overall quality of life and their ability to cope with the challenges of cancer treatment.
The presence of supportive care services is also essential. These services may include oncology nurses, social workers, nutritionists, and physical therapists. These professionals can provide patients with comprehensive support, addressing their physical, emotional, and social needs. The analysis should identify the availability of these services within the local healthcare system.
The assessment of prostate cancer care within 02814 should also consider the patient experience. This includes factors such as wait times for appointments, the ease of navigating the healthcare system, and the level of communication between healthcare providers and patients. Patient satisfaction surveys and reviews can provide valuable insights into the patient experience.
Furthermore, the analysis should examine the availability of financial assistance programs for patients who may struggle to afford the cost of cancer care. These programs can help patients access the treatments they need without facing financial hardship.
The integration of technology in prostate cancer care should be investigated. This includes the use of EHRs, patient portals, and mobile health applications. EHRs can improve care coordination and information sharing. Patient portals allow patients to access their medical records, communicate with their healthcare providers, and schedule appointments. Mobile health applications can provide patients with educational resources, reminders for appointments, and support for managing their symptoms.
In conclusion, evaluating prostate cancer care in Chepachet (02814) requires a comprehensive assessment of primary care access, specialist availability, the adoption of technology, mental health support, and the overall patient experience. The evaluation should identify the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system and provide recommendations for improvement. The goal is to ensure that patients in Chepachet have access to high-quality, patient-centered prostate cancer care.
To visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, physician density, and other relevant data points within the 02814 ZIP code and surrounding areas, consider exploring the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their mapping tools can provide a visual representation of the healthcare landscape, enabling a deeper understanding of the factors influencing prostate cancer care in Chepachet.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like