The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 29588, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina is 72 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 80.35 percent of the residents in 29588 has some form of health insurance. 42.20 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 54.41 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29588 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 10,708 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29588. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 11,132 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 10,163 health care providers accessible to residents in 29588, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29588, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Prostate Cancer Score | 35 |
---|---|
People Score | 11 |
Provider Score | 72 |
Hospital Score | 31 |
Travel Score | 57 |
29588 | Myrtle Beach | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Myrtle Beach, SC (ZIP Code 29588)
This analysis provides an assessment of prostate cancer care within the 29588 ZIP code, focusing on physician availability, healthcare infrastructure, and the integration of modern practices like telemedicine. The evaluation considers factors crucial for patient outcomes, including access to primary care, specialist expertise, and mental health support. This analysis aims to provide a nuanced perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape, ultimately informing residents about the resources available to them.
The foundation of effective prostate cancer care rests on strong primary care. In Myrtle Beach, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a critical factor. The physician-to-patient ratio significantly impacts access to preventative screenings, early diagnosis, and ongoing management. A higher ratio, indicating fewer PCPs per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial interventions. Conversely, a favorable ratio facilitates timely access to care, allowing for proactive health management and early detection of prostate cancer. The specific physician-to-patient ratio within 29588 needs to be carefully examined, considering the population demographics and the distribution of PCPs across the area. This data informs the initial stages of the score, assessing the ease with which residents can connect with a medical professional for routine check-ups and initial concerns.
Beyond primary care, the availability of specialized urologists is paramount. Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment require the expertise of specialists trained in the complexities of the disease. The presence of qualified urologists, their experience, and the types of treatments they offer (surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, etc.) are crucial elements of the scoring process. The number of urologists practicing within the ZIP code, along with their affiliations with hospitals and cancer centers, directly influences the quality of care available. The analysis will delve into the specific practices and their reputation within the community. It will examine the availability of advanced diagnostic tools, such as MRI and PET scans, and the adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques. This detailed assessment provides insight into the overall capacity of the local healthcare system to address prostate cancer effectively.
Standout practices within the 29588 area play a significant role in shaping the overall score. These practices often demonstrate a commitment to excellence, innovation, and patient-centered care. Identifying these practices involves evaluating their patient satisfaction scores, their participation in clinical trials, and their adoption of evidence-based practices. The analysis will specifically highlight practices that have implemented patient navigation programs, which help patients navigate the complex healthcare system, providing support and guidance throughout their treatment journey. These programs are particularly beneficial for individuals newly diagnosed with cancer, helping them understand their diagnosis, treatment options, and available resources. The presence of such programs significantly enhances the overall patient experience and contributes positively to the score.
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor in the evaluation. The increasing use of telemedicine offers numerous advantages, particularly for patients in rural or underserved areas. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits. This is especially beneficial for patients undergoing treatment for prostate cancer, who may experience fatigue or mobility issues. The analysis will assess the extent to which local practices have integrated telemedicine into their services. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual appointments, the use of remote monitoring devices, and the ease with which patients can access these services. Practices that have embraced telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and accessibility, contributing to a higher score.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical component of prostate cancer care. A cancer diagnosis can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health support services, such as counseling, support groups, and psychiatric care, is essential for comprehensive patient care. The analysis will evaluate the availability of these resources within the 29588 area, including the presence of mental health professionals specializing in oncology and the accessibility of these services. Practices that prioritize mental health support demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care, recognizing the importance of addressing the emotional and psychological aspects of the disease. This component directly influences the score, reflecting the overall commitment to patient well-being.
The overall prostate cancer score for 29588 will be a composite of these factors. It will reflect the availability of primary care, the expertise of specialists, the adoption of innovative practices, and the provision of mental health support. The score will provide a valuable tool for residents seeking to understand the quality of prostate cancer care available in their community. It will also serve as a benchmark for healthcare providers, highlighting areas for improvement and encouraging the adoption of best practices. The score will be a dynamic measure, subject to change as the healthcare landscape evolves and new resources become available.
The primary care availability in Myrtle Beach is a crucial determinant of the overall score. Factors such as the number of primary care physicians per capita, the wait times for appointments, and the accessibility of clinics all contribute to this assessment. The analysis will examine the distribution of primary care practices across the area, ensuring that all residents have reasonable access to care. The presence of community health centers and other resources for underserved populations will also be considered. The goal is to provide a comprehensive picture of the primary care landscape, highlighting both strengths and areas for improvement.
In conclusion, the Prostate Cancer Score for 29588 provides a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare resources available to patients in the Myrtle Beach area. It considers physician availability, specialist expertise, the adoption of modern practices, and the provision of mental health support. The score aims to inform residents about the quality of care available and to highlight areas for improvement within the local healthcare system. For a detailed visual representation of the healthcare landscape, including physician locations, hospital affiliations, and other relevant data, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like