The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 29615, Greenville, South Carolina is 67 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 90.79 percent of the residents in 29615 has some form of health insurance. 26.41 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.73 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29615 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 7,957 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 152 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29615. An estimate of 45 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 7,132 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 21,173 health care providers accessible to residents in 29615, Greenville, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29615, Greenville, South Carolina
Prostate Cancer Score | 65 |
---|---|
People Score | 44 |
Provider Score | 67 |
Hospital Score | 38 |
Travel Score | 65 |
29615 | Greenville | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of prostate cancer care and primary care accessibility within ZIP Code 29615 in Greenville, South Carolina, requires a multi-faceted approach. This evaluation considers factors like physician density, the availability of advanced diagnostic tools, the integration of telemedicine, and the provision of mental health support, all critical components of comprehensive patient care. This assessment is not a simple ranking, but a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a foundational element. A higher ratio of primary care physicians (PCPs) and urologists per capita generally indicates greater accessibility. However, raw numbers alone are insufficient. The distribution of these physicians within the ZIP code is also crucial. Are they clustered in one area, creating potential access challenges for residents in other parts of 29615? Are they accepting new patients? Data from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) and local hospital systems would be necessary to ascertain these metrics. A shortage of PCPs can lead to delayed diagnoses, while a scarcity of urologists can hinder timely specialist consultations and treatment initiation.
The quality of prostate cancer care extends beyond the availability of physicians. The presence of advanced diagnostic technologies is paramount. Facilities equipped with MRI machines, particularly those offering multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), are crucial for accurate staging and risk assessment. Access to advanced imaging allows for better identification of aggressive cancers and more targeted treatment strategies. The availability of sophisticated radiation therapy options, such as image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), is also a key indicator of quality. These technologies minimize damage to healthy tissues while maximizing the radiation dose to the tumor.
Standout practices within 29615 would be those that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care. This includes practices that offer comprehensive services, from initial screening and diagnosis to treatment and follow-up care. Practices that participate in clinical trials and research initiatives often provide access to cutting-edge treatments. Examining patient testimonials and online reviews, while not a definitive measure, can offer insights into patient satisfaction and the overall experience of care. Practices with a strong emphasis on patient education and shared decision-making are particularly noteworthy.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in the context of prostate cancer care. Telemedicine can facilitate remote consultations, follow-up appointments, and medication management. This is particularly beneficial for patients who live in areas with limited access to specialists or who have mobility challenges. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient convenience and reduce healthcare costs. Assessing the availability of telehealth services, the ease of scheduling virtual appointments, and the integration of telemedicine into the overall care pathway are critical.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are an essential component of comprehensive cancer care. A prostate cancer diagnosis and its treatment can have significant psychological impacts, including anxiety, depression, and sexual dysfunction. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, who specialize in oncology is crucial. Practices that offer integrated mental health services, or have strong referral networks to mental health providers, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. Assessing the availability of support groups, educational materials, and other resources that address the emotional and psychological needs of patients is paramount.
Primary care availability is a vital factor. PCPs play a critical role in screening for prostate cancer, coordinating care, and managing overall patient health. The ease with which residents of 29615 can access a PCP is a key indicator of healthcare accessibility. This involves considering factors such as appointment wait times, insurance acceptance, and the availability of evening and weekend hours. Practices that offer extended hours and same-day appointments enhance accessibility. The presence of urgent care clinics and walk-in clinics can also improve access to primary care services, especially for those with urgent health needs.
In conclusion, evaluating the prostate cancer care and primary care landscape within 29615 is complex. It necessitates a comprehensive assessment of physician density, access to advanced technologies, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the overall quality of care provided by local practices. While a definitive ranking is not possible without a detailed data analysis, the factors outlined above provide a framework for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in this area.
For those seeking a visual representation of healthcare access, physician distribution, and other relevant demographic data, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their platform provides a powerful tool for visualizing and analyzing healthcare data, allowing you to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Greenville and beyond.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like