The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 25444, Slanesville, West Virginia is 7 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 25444 has some form of health insurance. 30.40 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 81.94 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25444 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25444. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 28 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 157 health care providers accessible to residents in 25444, Slanesville, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25444, Slanesville, West Virginia
Prostate Cancer Score | 66 |
---|---|
People Score | 99 |
Provider Score | 7 |
Hospital Score | 52 |
Travel Score | 57 |
25444 | Slanesville | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Slanesville, WV (ZIP Code 25444)**
Analyzing prostate cancer care and primary care access in Slanesville, West Virginia (ZIP code 25444) requires a multi-faceted approach. We need to evaluate the quality of available medical professionals, their resources, and the overall healthcare infrastructure within the community. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview, considering factors beyond simple physician counts.
The first crucial element is physician availability. Slanesville, being a rural area, likely faces challenges in this regard. A low physician-to-patient ratio would be a significant concern. The national average physician-to-population ratio serves as a benchmark. Any ratio significantly below this suggests potential difficulties in accessing timely medical care, including prostate cancer screenings and treatment. This impacts early detection, which is crucial for successful outcomes.
Primary care is the cornerstone of preventative healthcare. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) directly influences prostate cancer outcomes. PCPs are often the first point of contact for patients, initiating screenings, offering education, and coordinating referrals to specialists. A shortage of PCPs in Slanesville would translate to delayed diagnoses and potentially poorer prognoses.
Evaluating specific practices within the ZIP code is essential. Are there any standout practices known for their commitment to preventative care, including prostate cancer screening? Do these practices employ modern technologies, such as electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals? These technologies streamline communication, improve care coordination, and enhance patient engagement. Identifying practices with a strong focus on patient education and proactive screening protocols would be a positive indicator.
Telemedicine is increasingly important, particularly in rural areas. Does Slanesville have practices that offer telemedicine services? Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to consult with specialists remotely. This is especially beneficial for patients needing consultations with urologists or oncologists who might not be readily available locally. The adoption of telemedicine signifies a commitment to expanding access to specialized care.
Mental health resources are another critical aspect of overall healthcare. A prostate cancer diagnosis can be emotionally challenging. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, within the community is crucial. These professionals can provide support to patients navigating the emotional and psychological impacts of their diagnosis and treatment. Access to mental health services should be considered when evaluating the overall healthcare landscape.
Analyzing the age and experience of the physicians is also important. Are there experienced urologists or oncologists serving the area? Experience often translates to expertise in diagnosing and treating prostate cancer. The presence of board-certified specialists would be a strong positive indicator.
Furthermore, the availability of advanced diagnostic and treatment technologies should be assessed. Does the area have access to advanced imaging techniques like MRI and PET scans? Are there facilities offering advanced treatments like robotic surgery or radiation therapy? The availability of these technologies significantly impacts the quality of care.
Evaluating the local hospital’s capabilities is also critical. Is there a hospital within reasonable driving distance that offers comprehensive cancer care? Does the hospital have a dedicated oncology department or a cancer center? The hospital’s infrastructure and resources directly influence the level of care patients can receive.
The analysis should also consider patient education resources. Are there readily available materials about prostate cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment? Does the community have support groups or educational programs for patients and their families? Patient education empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their health.
The quality of insurance coverage is also a factor. The analysis should consider the types of insurance plans accepted by local healthcare providers. Access to affordable healthcare is essential for ensuring that patients can receive the care they need.
Finally, assessing the community's overall health awareness is important. Are there public health initiatives promoting prostate cancer awareness and screening? Community engagement in health-related activities can significantly impact early detection rates.
This comprehensive analysis, considering all these factors, will provide a more accurate 'Prostate Cancer Score' for doctors in ZIP code 25444 and primary care availability in Slanesville. The score will reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system.
Ultimately, this analysis will reveal the challenges and opportunities within the local healthcare system. It will highlight areas needing improvement, such as increasing physician availability, expanding telemedicine services, and enhancing mental health resources. This information is crucial for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It allows for informed decision-making and targeted interventions to improve prostate cancer outcomes in Slanesville.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like