Prostate Cancer Score

26412, Orlando, West Virginia Prostate Cancer Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 26412, Orlando, West Virginia

The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 26412, Orlando, West Virginia is 50 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 91.26 percent of the residents in 26412 has some form of health insurance. 57.93 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.24 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26412 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 37 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26412. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 95 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 551 health care providers accessible to residents in 26412, Orlando, West Virginia.

Health Scores in 26412, Orlando, West Virginia

Prostate Cancer Score 71
People Score 82
Provider Score 50
Hospital Score 53
Travel Score 38

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

26412 Orlando West Virginia
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 26412, Orlando, West Virginia

## Prostate Cancer Score: An Analysis of Physician Access and Care in Selected Regions

This analysis evaluates the landscape of prostate cancer care, focusing on two distinct geographical areas: ZIP Code 26412 and Orlando, Florida, with a particular emphasis on primary care availability. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available to men seeking diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing support for prostate cancer. This is not a definitive ranking, but rather an assessment of factors influencing care accessibility and quality, ultimately informing individuals about potential strengths and weaknesses within each area.

**ZIP Code 26412: A Rural Perspective**

ZIP Code 26412, representing a potentially rural or underserved area, presents unique challenges and opportunities in prostate cancer care. The primary concern is likely the availability of specialists, particularly urologists and oncologists. A critical metric to assess is the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio indicates a shortage of specialists, which can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed diagnoses, and potentially compromised treatment outcomes. Furthermore, the geographic dispersion of the population within 26412 may necessitate longer travel times to access specialized care, adding another layer of complexity.

Standout practices within this ZIP code, if any, would likely be those that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care. This includes practices that actively engage in preventative screening, provide comprehensive patient education, and offer robust support services. The adoption of telemedicine is crucial in rural settings. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with specialists remotely, reducing the need for extensive travel and improving access to care. Practices that embrace telemedicine for consultations, follow-up appointments, and even remote monitoring of treatment side effects will be highly valued.

Mental health resources are also paramount. A prostate cancer diagnosis can be emotionally taxing, and access to mental health professionals is essential for managing anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. The availability of support groups, individual therapy, and psychiatric services, either within the practice or through referral networks, significantly impacts the overall quality of care. The integration of mental health services into the standard of care is a crucial element in a comprehensive approach.

**Primary Care Availability in Orlando: A Metropolitan Focus**

Orlando, with its larger population and more developed healthcare infrastructure, presents a different set of considerations. The primary focus shifts to the density and accessibility of primary care physicians (PCPs). PCPs play a vital role in prostate cancer screening, early detection, and patient navigation. The availability of PCPs directly influences the likelihood of timely screening and prompt referrals to specialists. High PCP density suggests easier access to initial consultations and preventative care.

The quality of primary care practices in Orlando is also a key factor. Practices that emphasize preventative care, including regular prostate cancer screenings (PSA tests and digital rectal exams), are crucial. The ability of PCPs to effectively communicate with patients, explain complex medical information, and address their concerns significantly impacts the patient experience. Practices that have a strong network of specialists and can facilitate smooth referrals are also highly desirable.

Standout practices in Orlando would likely be those that integrate advanced technologies and patient-centered care models. This includes the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for seamless information sharing, patient portals for easy access to medical information, and personalized treatment plans. Practices that offer extended hours, weekend appointments, and convenient locations can also improve accessibility.

Telemedicine adoption is also relevant in Orlando, even in a metropolitan setting. It can improve access to specialists, reduce travel time, and provide flexibility for patients. Practices that embrace telemedicine for follow-up appointments, medication management, and remote monitoring can enhance patient convenience and satisfaction.

Mental health resources are equally important in Orlando. The availability of mental health professionals, support groups, and psychiatric services is crucial for managing the emotional and psychological challenges associated with a prostate cancer diagnosis. The integration of mental health services into the care continuum is essential for a holistic approach.

**Comparative Considerations and Overall Assessment**

Comparing the two areas, 26412 and Orlando, reveals significant differences in the landscape of prostate cancer care. 26412 likely faces challenges related to specialist availability, geographic access, and potentially limited resources. Orlando, on the other hand, may offer greater access to specialists and a more developed healthcare infrastructure, but the quality of primary care and the integration of mental health services remain critical factors.

The overall assessment for each area would depend on a more granular investigation. This would require detailed data on physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The presence of accredited cancer centers, specialized treatment options (e.g., radiation therapy, robotic surgery), and patient support programs would also be considered.

**Conclusion: Visualizing the Landscape with CartoChrome Maps**

Understanding the nuances of prostate cancer care requires a comprehensive understanding of the available resources. This analysis provides a framework for evaluating physician access, telemedicine adoption, and mental health support in specific geographical regions. To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in your area, and to visualize the distribution of resources, consider exploring the power of geospatial data and mapping tools.

**Call to Action:**

For a more detailed and visually informative understanding of the healthcare resources available in your area, including physician locations, specialist availability, and access to support services, explore the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome. Their platform can help you visualize and analyze the data, empowering you to make informed decisions about your health.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 26412, Orlando, West Virginia

You may also like

26447, Walkersville, West Virginia
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 26412: 6.34 Miles

Total Population:

26384, Linn, West Virginia
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 26412: 8.07 Miles

Total Population:

26430, Sand Fork, West Virginia
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 26412: 8.38 Miles

Total Population:

26376, Ireland, West Virginia
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 26412: 10.27 Miles

Total Population:

26452, Weston, West Virginia
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 26412: 12.45 Miles

Total Population:

26372, Horner, West Virginia
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 26412: 13.68 Miles

Total Population:

26443, Troy, West Virginia
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 26412: 14.72 Miles

Total Population:

26378, Jane Lew, West Virginia
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 26412: 17.56 Miles

Total Population:

26411, New Milton, West Virginia
Prostate Cancer Score
Prostate Cancer Score

Distance from 26412: 21.09 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 26412, Orlando, West Virginia